I’m a long term reader of 35mmc and recently read an interesting article, The Miniature Camera Monthly by Art Meripol, 27 February 2026. Art gave readers a look at the August, 1939 issue of this early photography magazine. As I read through the articles, I came to this page of cameras.
As a camera collector, I perused the cameras in the ad carefully to see what I might like. I immediately spotted the Skyview D 3 1/4 X 4 ¼ camera with Tessar lens which was obviously an aerial camera from the period. From the viewfinder proportion, I thought this might be smaller than many of the classic aerial cameras I have seen. I did an online search and found almost no information, except this from Historic Camera.com, a site maintained by the Historic Camera Collector’s Club (used with permission.)
Not expecting any luck in finding one, I was surprised to see there was a camera listed on an auction site as Skyview aerial camera Carl Zeiss 150mm F4.5 lens + bag mag + plate holder + case. The price was not cheap, but not horrible and the description showed it would be one I could easily carry at 5 pounds, especially with the large handle on the side. It also focused closer than I expected for an aerial camera so that it would be easily usable on the ground.
I just had to buy it.
In addition to wanting it from a camera collector’s viewpoint, I also have a bit of history with aerial photography. After college, I took a three month job while waiting to enter the Air Force. The job involved using blueprint sized aerial photographs of real estate property lines for a tax evaluation program. In the Air Force, I was an aerial photo interpreter and viewed many hundreds of aerial photographs. Years later, I bought an airplane and often shot photos out the window of my Cessna 150. I also flew in a county helicopter and shot pictures of all our facilities for enlargements and mounting in the board room, all with my Olympus OM-1. It appears that aerial photography is in my blood. But now there is a twist and that is terrestrial photography with an aerial camera.
The actual camera differed slightly from the overview from the Historic Camera Collector’s Club in that it focused to 5 feet and there is no infinity focus lock. All sounded good there. The kit came with two film holders. One was a Graflex “Bag Mag” and the other was a Graflex Film Pack Adaptor. Neither looked like anything I would want to use and there was no spring back or Graflok back on the camera. My choices were to buy some standard sheet film holders plus a spring or Graflok back or instead, a Graflex Graphic 23 roll film holder (6X9 format on 120 film.) The normal film size for this camera is 3 1/4 X 4 1/4, a not so common size that makes availability of all the accessories that I considered limited and more expensive. I chose the roll film holder that I found on the same auction site. When it arrived, I had to fabricate a wider aluminum strip to hold the roll film adapter against the camera and added a felt seal along a space that was apparent. It was quick work with a hacksaw and drill.




I cleaned the shutter, attached the roll film back, and shot a test roll of 120 format film to check for light leaks and focus. All went well.
How does it shoot? It is a bit heavy at 6 pounds, 5 ounces with the back and requires a number of steps. First you release the film winder, then wind the film, set shutter speed, f/stop and focus. Before shooting you also have to cock the shutter. But that really isn’t any different with shooting another Graflex 23 roll film back on my 2 ½ X 3 ½ Speed Graphic. And did I say it was fun? Yes it is.
Here are some shots, appropriately from a local airport.
Finally, while searching the auction site, I found this postcard noting the photograph was courtesy of Skyview Camera Company. I had to add it to my kit.
Now I need to take this camera up in an airplane, preferable a biplane. Not sure when or if but I can dream.
Addendum
Shortly after I wrote this article, I purchased three Skyview Camera advertisements, clipped from old camera magazines. The first and third ads shows the smaller Skyview Model K camera while the second one shows the model I have, the Model D



But wait, there’s more. While digging through the internet, I found the following picture of Amelia Earhart with a Skyview Model K. She is holding it with the lens up and it does not seem to have a film back attached.
I am publishing this image through the courtesy of the Ohio Camera Collectors Society and am using it with their permission and the Estate of Derwin Worster.

Share this post:
Comments
Gary Smith on Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest
Comment posted: 07/05/2026
Comment posted: 07/05/2026
Jeffrey J Luhn on Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest
Comment posted: 08/05/2026
Very interesting post, and good photos! I don't think any other point-and-shoot camera would want to meet your Skyview in a dark alley!!!
Back in the mid 1970's there was a building boom in the San Francisco Bay Area and I was hired to shoot loads of aerial shots for city planners and developers. My friend had a Luscombe plane, circa 1948. It was a good spotting plane and the passenger door was easy to remove before take off. Very slow air speed! We flew out of a muni airstrip in Hayward, Ca. I used a Hasselblad with a bulk film back. The job paid well. One day, while I was looking to buy a large format aerial camera for higher resolution shots, I met the guys at Pacific Aerial Surveys at the Oakland airport. Those guys had a downward mounted camera with 9" motorized roll film. It imprinted the location on the negative!!!! How? I don't know. They were doing shots for the California Division of Highways and were constantly updating their files. I just bought current shots from them and marked them up. MAN THEIR STUFF WAS SHARP!!!! If you're ever at the civil aviation area at Oakland airport, you will see lots of their huge prints. HUGE! You can see people in their backyards cutting grass. HUGE PRINTS.
I imagine shooting on the street with your camera would get some looks!!! Keep posting your good stuff!
Comment posted: 08/05/2026
Comment posted: 08/05/2026
Comment posted: 08/05/2026
Art Meripol on Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest
Comment posted: 08/05/2026
Comment posted: 08/05/2026
Omar Tibi on Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest
Comment posted: 10/05/2026
I'm also very curious as to your experience interpreting aerial photographs. I can only imagine how overwhelming trailing through miles of negatives can be! Did you use color at all? I know panchro has the best detail resolution at altitude, but I'm curious what purpose something like Aerocolor would've had.
Happy shooting!
Comment posted: 10/05/2026