FujiFilm E-550

FujiFilm E-550 Review – A Balancing Act – By Adam Kendall

The E-Series cameras from FujiFilm are, as I have come to realize, are simply complex. The E-500/510, E-900 and Fujifilm E-550 that sits between the two are both progression and compromise exemplified. I don’t get it. In some areas each model is more capable than the last, but in others, the cameras are less capable. Overall though, the E-550 falls right between the basic entry level E-500 and advanced E-900. More or less, this is a good thing.

The camera, like its siblings, is elegant, simple and function defined.

FujiFilm E-550 front
The FujiFilm E-550 is perhaps the most elegant of the E-Series’ designs. It also uses the adapter tube of the E-900: a bonus.
FujiFilm E-550 dial
The command dial offers the typical options…and a couple of others I never bother with.
FujiFilm E-550 ports
The weak point of the camera is this panel to the left of the screen. A rubber panel was factory, but never really stays on. Not sure what the designers were thinking here.
FujiFilm E-550 viewfunder
Much like the others in the line, the viewfinder is not the best, but it gets the job done.
FujiFilm E-550 buttons
The buttons are intuitive–perfect.

Exposure Capabilities

In a general sense, the Fujifilm E-550 provides a decent experience to the user. The camera includes Manual, Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority and Program exposure modes. Not bad. And of course, AUTO and other SCENE modes are present. The camera was designed for both novices and advanced users alike.

Field Note: My family and I headed out to the Boardman River this afternoon to enjoy some overcast skies.and cool temperatures. I had planned to capture a small waterfall that leads into the main body of water. Overcast skies are perfect for this. I brought along my ND-1000 filter to really slow down the waters movement. As it turns out, the E-550 only exposes to 3 seconds…about 5 seconds too short for the preferred manual exposure at ISO 80 (base ISO). The E-900 has greater exposure latitude. I ended up compromising, and had to increase my ISO to 200. Shucks. Though in all fairness, most users will never use a ND-1000 filter.

Image Quality

Dynamic range, blown highlights and barrel distortion be damned. ‘It’s a small sensor’; ‘noise is the devil’–at least that is the impression I get from online sites. I don’t see this as a bad thing. I see this as a challenge to the status quo. Small sensors have been, and always will be relevant (smartphone cameras–eh?). The camera offers various JPEG file sizes in addition to RAW capture. In reality, image quality is what you make of it. Everyone sees the world through their own eyes.

And yes, as others online have asserted, JPEGS from this (and other FF cameras) camera are quite acceptable on their own merits. Honestly, I edit the JPEGs to great success. But as I always say, image quality is highly subjective. Memory Quality is more important (at least to me).

Think about it: who ever looks at an image, and immediately thinks “just look at that image noise…and that distortion…the photographer ought to be ashamed of themselves!”

Save a few… Likely 90% of photographers do not think about this. Photography has traditionally been about memories. Not about image quality. Right?

Fujifilm E-550 Image Gallery

This first set of images are from Munising (@Pictured Rocks), Upper Peninsula, Michigan

This set are Brown Bridge Quiet Area, Traverse City, Michigan

And Finally, Boardman River Trail

Moody and Delightful

The camera creates some quite lovely, moody images. I have spent much time with this camera, and have come to discover I am not really into its color rendition. The E-900 excels here. Where the Fujifilm E-550 is best in the monochrome realm. I am simply delighted by the results produced.

I am also delighted in the fact that the camera is capable of capturing the memories the way I see them in my mind. This is memory quality exemplified.

FujiFilm E-550 pros & cons

What I Like about the Fujifilm E-550

  • Style and aesthetic on point…more so than the E-900. Too bad the E-900 was not shaped just like this, but just in black.
  • The camera is a camera
  • Ergonomics
  • RAW capture
  • Spartan, yet functional menu system
  • Use of adapter ring!
  • ‘AA’ batteries

What I am not into

  • Lack of metal tripod mount
  • 3 second exposure maximum
  • Wish there was an ISO 50 option
  • Viewfinder dim like other in line
  • Color not accurate (though my perception of color is a bit off….take this with a grain of salt)

As a landscape photographer, I enjoy cameras such as the Fujifilm E-550 . It fits in a jacket pocket, is extremely light, and is capable of intriguing results. In some ways its superior to the E-900, but in other’s it lags behind. It also has traces of its E-500 lineage.

Ultimately, the Fujifilm E-550  is a camera. Nothing more, nothing less.


Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience

There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:

Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Subscribe here.

Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.

About The Author

8 thoughts on “FujiFilm E-550 Review – A Balancing Act – By Adam Kendall”

    1. Many thanks Ralph. I appreciate the feedback. Part of me wishes I had included the color versions of these images too. However, the color just seems off to me.

      Stay safe out there. 🙂

    1. Many thanks. While I do understand the benefits of large sensors, I have made it a goal to demonstrate the relevance of small sensored cameras in 2020. Sure, I will never take out the E-550 for wedding work, but by Jove, still subjects are just as gratifying to capture with a small sensor. Your compliment is valued immensly.

      An Olympus C-5050 review may be in the works…stay tuned.

  1. My first digital camera was a Fujifilm Finepix E-500. I had chosen it because it took AA batteries, had an optical viewfinder, and was compact. It was just wide enough and almost long enough, optically for casual photos. I bought this digital camera after putting my film cameras aside when a job change made me stop taking pictures.
    Film expiration dates had driven me to consider digital cameras, since the film I had on hand was past it’s “use by” date. The E-500 worked for casual photography, since I was a “record keeper” rather than an Artist. I didn’t use the monochrome option, since I’d been a black-and-white print maker in the days of Agfa Protriga Rapid and Polycontrast papers.
    It didn’t “do Kodachrome” without some image settings, but it was close enough to Kodacolor. I discovered Lithium AA cells for “rapid sequence” and flash photography. Limitations of this entry-level P&S camera led me to look at DSLR cameras. I discovered a Nikon D40 kit on sale at Radio Shack, and it led back to using Nikon AI lenses manually. I went from the 3MP Fuji E-500 to the 6MP Nikon D40, and, eventually the 16MP Nikon D7000. It’s been an interesting digital still photography journey, but it’s not as interesting as film photography.
    Maybe it’s time to send the Nikon FM2 for a CLA session, and see what Ektachrome E100 is like.

    1. Hello Patrick!

      Thanks for your thoughts. I also have had a D-40…a great camera I passed down to my sister-in-law. I currently run a D-5000 and D-7100. Both which I love to use. Despite owning these, I still find fullfilment in point and shoot photography. In fact, 90% percent of my work is from either a FujiFilm S-9100 or Olympus SP-570. I love the versatility they afford for landscape photography–especially macro work to get those little details.

      From my experience, the Ektrachrome is a delight! I ran a roll through, I believe, my Ricoh AF-7.

      I appreciate you reading my post!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top