My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

By Hamish Gill

I’m not usually interested in commenting on new camera releases, but the new Panasonic L10 has inspired some thoughts as I walked the dog in the woods this morning. I always take a camera with me, and today I took my decade-and-a-bit old LX100 with me to remind me why I don’t need to upgrade.

I’ve been waiting for Panasonic to release a new version of the LX100 pretty much since I bought it. It’s nearly the perfect compact digital camera as far as I’m concerned – it just lacks the small advantages an articulated screen brings to the table. My camera is the original LX100 released in 2014, but the LX100 MK2 doesn’t have an articulated screen either, and nor do any of the Panasonic-derived Leica branded alternatives. What the Leica alternatives – specifically the D-LUX 8 – do have is the nicer user interface – I was nearly sold on that alone whole camera when it came out – but ultimately I stuck with my old LX100.

Now the L10 has arrived and it does have an articulated screen, so surely I’m in the market…? Well, unfortunately for me (or possibly fortunately since I can’t really afford one anyway), Panasonic have changed one specific thing that means it doesn’t appeal as much as it might, even with the inclusion of a screen.

The major deal-breaker for me is the switch to a PSAM dial from a shutter speed dial. The implementation of mode selection on the LX100 – as with a lot of Fuji cameras – is perfect to me. More perfect even than on my precious Nikon Zf which is almost clunky by comparison. On the LX100, you select A on both dials for full auto. A on the shutter dial and an aperture on the lens for aperture priority. A on the lens and a shutter speed on the shutter dial for shutter priority. A shutter speed on the shutter dial and an aperture on the lens for full manual. This is, by far, the most logical and visually easy to read/understand user interface a camera can have – in my opinion, obviously. The deviation from this in the L10 unfortunately undermines the inclusion of an articulated screen for me. I’m also a little put off by a few of the extra buttons and switches – specifically the LUT button which is of zero interest to me.

I should say though, this isn’t supposed to be one of those posts where I angrily talk about how Panasonic haven’t made the camera that perfectly fits my exact needs – if you want to read from those types, the LX100 facebook group is a good place to start. It is true though, they haven’t made my perfect compact digital camera, but I’m totally sanguine about the fact. Aside from anything else, I can’t afford one anyway, so it would probably be more frustrating if they had made succeeded in my eyes. I also think it looks like it’s going to be a really bloody good camera. The extremely useful lens with its nice bright aperture and its 24-75mm range is still a feature. It still has the nice and big, but not too big 4/3rds sensor which provides an ideal balance of quality and compact size for a camera of this type. I’m sure the viewfinder and screen will both be better than those on my old LX100. It also sounds like it’s got some fancy modern AF capabilities too. And with the articulated screen, it’s going to be a very useful and very capable little camera that will definitely appeal to and make a lot of people very happy, I am absolutely certain of that.

Not me though. For how much and for what I use my old LX100, I am totally happy with it. It goes pretty much everywhere in my work bag with me – it’s really handy and perfectly good enough for when I get a little job sprung on me by a client.

Jo, far left in the image is a client who was also involved in the promotion of this event – I happened to cross paths with her on a day in the office and she asked me if I could take a couple of snaps for her. I just had the LX100 on me, but I wasn’t worried, it did the job just fine.

I also find it perfect for my hobby for what I need it for too. To kick off, I use it to take photos of other cameras and for other content for the this website.

From a post about the forthcoming Alfie [BOXX] camera – find out more here
And above all of that, it’s also my default carry-everywhere camera when I don’t want to take something else. It’s the camera that goes in my pocket or shoulder bag when I know I’m going to want a camera, but there’s just nothing else in the cabinet that I can be bothered to take with me. That might sound like a backhanded compliment to it, but actually, in those moments when I really want to take a camera but don’t really want to think, the LX100 feels like the perfect crutch!

Walk in the woods
A shot from my walk in the woods this morning

In all these situations, aside from when I want to shoot something from a low or high angle, it’s never let me down… and really, even that is just a minor inconvenience, I can still manage.

Walk in the woods
A low angle shot from my walk in the woods this morning

At least until my LX100 dies, at which point I might reconsider this position, I’m sticking to it rather than being tempted by the new Panasonic L10. The new camera just isn’t quite perfect enough for me to tempt me, however brilliant I expect it is likely to be!

What really will cause me issues though is if Leica bring out a Leica D-LUX 9 that has their incredible user interface, this new articulated screen, less additional superfluous to me buttons and a shutter speed dial… that really would be the perfect compact digital camera of for me!

Share this post:

About The Author

By Hamish Gill
I started taking photos at the age of 9. Since then I've taken photos for a hobby, sold cameras for a living, and for a little more than decade I've been a professional photographer and, of course, weekly contributor to 35mmc.
Read More Articles From Hamish Gill

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Ibraar Hussain on My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

Comment posted: 13/05/2026

Thanks Hamish
That L10 looks very nicely made, versatile. I hope Panasonic do well with this and wondering if OM will release something?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 13/05/2026

Being skint not much chance of me ever owning one, but even with my dislike for mirrorless - this type of compact makes sense and suits the nature of it It’s reportedly very quick as well, perfect snapshot carry around camera with enough for wide angle and portraits

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

JA on My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

Comment posted: 13/05/2026

My only digital camera remains to be a lumix gf1. It just works in the way i need, when i need without worrying about it getting trashed.

All it costs is some tape to keep the battery door shut
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

Comment posted: 13/05/2026

I didn't notice that the shutter speed dial was changed! I also had the original LX100 and loved it. Eventually despaired that the lens didn't have "enough" reach and replaced it with a Lumix GX85. Lumix has put a 25mp 4/3rds sensor into their GH7 and I had hoped that the replacement for the LX100 would have more megapixels. They also (apparently) haven't addressed the dust sucking complaints although that was never an issue for me. Added phase detect is good although I never had focus issues with my LX100, nor is the higher focus point count going to sway me. The increased size and weight are what really soured me on the L10. The LX100 wasn't >really< pocketable (unless you had on baggy pants or a coat with huge pockets, so I don't imagine this one will travel any better. All that said, I'm glad that Panasonic has released the L10 and it will be interesting to see how the Leica D-Lux 9 turns out (since there will surely be a Leica version). This camera will likely serve an audience, I'm just not sure that it is going to cause many to upgrade from any version of the LX100.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Colclough on My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

Comment posted: 13/05/2026

I’ve owned and used a LX100 mk11 for quite a while now and love the camera it’s delivered me some prize winning shots wouldn’t swap it for the world.
I would love to see a mk111 LX100 version out with a tilting and folding rear view screen then I would consider an upgrade also loosing the shutter speed dial is a big no no for me sorry no new camera.
I also own a few some top range Nikons but my LX100 is my companion and with me everyday while my Nikons stay in the cabinet.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Hume on My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

Comment posted: 13/05/2026

Hey Hamish… This camera was news to me until a few hours ago. And I must say my first thoughts were, "Oh dear, is the D-Lux 8 still best or do I need to think about this?" So I watched and read a few reviews. There's an Aussie bloke called Michael Ruderman who did a good one, as well as Emily's very glowing one on Micro Four Nerds. I'm halfway through part two of my D-Lux 8 thing so I'll wrap that up and include comments on thoughts about the L10 and get that across to you in the next few days. But I'm with you I think. I guess I'd sum my thoughts up that if I were a Vlogger and didn't have a camera, this L10 would be pretty compelling. But for stills - nah, retrograde from what I've got. I do think the Tiatanium looks good though! Cheers.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 13/05/2026

I'm sure there will be a Leica derivative of this new Panasonic David - be patient. I've also watched a number of YT videos. I didn't realize that they had changed the top dial from a shutter speed dial to a PASM dial. I was perfectly happy with how you switched between manual, shutter and aperture priority on the original.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 13/05/2026

I'm pretty sure of that, Gary. The same camera and lens, but with a hefty mark-up for a different camera body, a different software finish and, of course, that beloved Leica logo. That's all a Leica fan needs. :-))))

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alan Simpson on My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

Comment posted: 14/05/2026

Another user here perfectly happy with his original LX100. As well as the clearly marked shutter speed dial and aperture ring, the i) step zoom and ii) zoom recall features (i. use the zoom ring to set six prime focal lengths; and ii. set the camera to start with the same focal length as when previously turned off) are 'must have' features for me. I know they dropped those features from the D-Lux 8, but have they retained them in the L10?

My only complaint with my LX100 is a dust spot on the sensor, which I have to clone out whenever it appears in the sky. I believe there is a repairer here in the UK who can clean the sensors on the Leica versions - maybe I should ask him about cleaning my Panasonic.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens replied:

Comment posted: 14/05/2026

The Lumix LX 100 is certainly an interesting and good camera. However, I wouldn’t buy it – and certainly not the L10 – without a shutter speed dial. The reason is the ‘blind spot’ you describe, and the difficulty of eliminating it with a fixed lens. In any case, it’s more expensive than a sensor clean if you can find someone who does it properly. I encountered this problem a good 10 years ago on a Lumix TZ10, then on the TZ22, and Panasonic just shrugged it off. Okay, the cameras aren’t comparable; it’s simply down to the design. The step up to a compact Fujifilm or Sony with an APS-C sensor and interchangeable lenses wasn’t far off, and I’ve never regretted it.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Simon Sheldon on My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

Comment posted: 22/05/2026

Does the L10 have that feature of the number of mega pixels being the same no matter what ratio you choose, 3:4, 3:2, 1:1 or even 16:9
The only other point and shoot that comes close for me is the Fujifilm X30 also sadly discontinued
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Kevin Lord on My LX100 and why the new Panasonic L10 doesn’t appeal

Comment posted: 12/06/2026

I thought the original LX100 would be perfect. I really liked that it had a leaf shutter (as I recall - hope I am not imaging that). I rented one to be sure and within 5 minutes of receiving it, I knew it was not for me. It was just too small! It was the same reaction I had when I tried a Sony RX100. So a bit bigger is better for me. And the PASM dial is not a big issue, especially if it has one or two Custom Modes (the down side of no PASM dial is that there are often no Custom Modes except maybe in the menu). So this looks great - except for the price. I have never spent more than $1,000 on a camera and it is going to take a couple of years for used prices to fall that much - and if it becomes a cult favorite, as it might, maybe never.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *