I’m sure the majority of those reading 35mmc need no introduction to Michael Kenna, his work is not only superb but well known. In the introduction a quote from Kenna is shared:
“I’ve always considered the make and format of a camera to be ultimately low on the priority scale when it comes to making pictures, I think personal vision is far more important.” Frances Malcolm, Holga
This collection of Kenna’s images taken on a Holga camera really do show his power of composition and I honestly don’t know what else to say about them. It seems too obvious to say that but it is a beautiful collection of images.
In the Photography Books and Theory Facebook group we often find ourselves drawn into discussions of the definition of art. Of course we’ve never come to a definitive conclusion but these discussions have given me much food for thought and I find myself trying to consider these images as if I didn’t know their context (i.e. being a collection of images shot on a toy camera).
Would each image stand on its own merits? This question is purely subjective and the images I feel work without context are simply to my taste and others may well disagree. I’m sharing a couple of my favourites and one that I think only works within its context.
This example leapt out at me. It falls into the category of abstract, which I am a big fan of. I love the use of reflections, you have to take a moment to determine what you are really looking at.
This image is clearly well loved as it was chosen as the cover image for the book. I think it’s magnificent, the fact that given the limitations of the camera, Kenna was able to capture the wings in motion whilst freezing the body and head in focus. I think this image is beautiful regardless of the equipment used to capture it.
And now for one I’m less fond of. To me this image stands nicely next to the image on the facing page but on it’s own it’s neither here nor there for me. Perhaps it’s relying too heavily on the classic vignetting of the Holga to give it character. Or perhaps, as I’ve said before, it’s just not my cup of tea.
I personally love to see text alongside images, for me it brings a whole new meaning to the image. I can re-examine it with fresh eyes, find clues from the text in the image and see new layers. But not everyone agrees with me, our very own Sroyon has told me that he prefers the images alone, to draw his own conclusions on the meaning of the image.
Share this post: