Featured Image of Fuji X-T1 camera with its DIY rotating half-frame lens cap attached

“Half Framing” Practically Any Camera (Part 2 of 2)

By Dave Powell

Just over a year ago, I proposed this oddball idea. The article simulated a potential technique for shooting half-frame images with almost any camera and without modifications. Results were promising, and I promised to do a real test with an SLR (my Nikon FE).

But some of you may have noticed my recent absence from 35mmc (which I explained in a recent One-Shot Halloween Story). Over that hiatus, I exchanged my Fuji X-Pro1 mirrorless body for a slightly upgraded Fuji X-T1 (with an improved sensor and more of the physical controls that I preferred). I quickly discovered that the X-T1 allowed double-exposures. To familiarize myself with that, I tried several 16MP “full-frame” double-exposures on Boston’s North Shore. This was the best:

First full-frame double-exposure test shot
“Two Islands in the Stream”  Fuji 35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 400, f/8, 1/1800 sec. Taken within seconds of each other, the shots simply captured the progress of a small boat. The image also contains an enigma. Can you spot it? (I’ll describe it in the Comments.)

I then tried an interior:

Second full-frame double-exposure test shot
“Lamp Zoom”  Fuji 35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 500, f/4.5, 1/30 sec.

These gave me confidence to proceed with my “in-camera half-frame” experiment.

A Learning Curve with Payoffs

As described in Part 1, the technique uses a rotatable lens cap with a sector cut out. Below is the antique original that inspired the idea:

Antique lens cap that spawned this ideaCalled the “Burke & James ‘The Ideal’ Camera Duplicator,” it allowed early 20th Century circus and carnival photographers to sell souvenir prints of people talking, dancing or playing games with themselves. All for 25 cents a print!

I thought this simple device would enable many film and digital cameras to shoot half-frame diptychs using similarly masked, in-camera, double-exposures. On digital, film, 35mm, Micro Four-Thirds, Medium- and Large-Format cameras, one would shoot a first half-frame image with the lens cap’s entrance hole on the right (or left) and then take a second image with the hole rotated to the other side. My X-T1 does double-exposures and automatically saves both halves as a single full-sensor image.

Film half-frame film cameras like the original Olympus Pens use a fixed film-plane mask to crop shots to just under half the normal 35mm width. The advance lever then moves the film just past a shot to expose the next one in a non-overlapping area. The smaller side-by-side images are usually separated by a white gap. It works really well and without much fuss.

I quickly discovered that things are a little more complicated with this article’s technique! But it allows any double-exposing system to capture in-camera diptychs that bespoke half-frame cameras cannot. Things like “blended” half-frame pairs, full-frame-width shots located above and below each other, full-frame-width panoramas, and even images separated diagonally!

But First: Improving that Lens Cap

For reasons that will become obvious in my later workflow list, I wanted the lens cap to rotate easily while I continued to look through the viewfinder. This was the perfect solution:

Improved DIY lens cap for modern useI replaced the glass polarizer from a “rotatable” two-part filter ring with a semi-circular plastic light mask. As you see above, the ring’s fixed part is a 52-55mm step-up ring, and the portion that holds the mask rotates freely on it. (My original Fuji lenses have 52mm filter threads.)

The next step was trickier: Determining how big the cap’s semicircular mask should be. The hole in the Burke & James cap spanned about 1/3rd of the ring’s diameter. So I cut off about 1/3rd of my plastic disk, placed the remainder where the original polarizer had been (as shown in the above photo), locked it down with the original retainer ring, and screwed it on the X-T1 lens. But I saw absolutely nothing in the viewfinder.

That stumped me, until I realized that those old-timey carnival photographers used large-format cameras with lenses mounted on long bellows. Their cameras had such long focal lengths, that the cone of light coming through the lens cap expanded significantly before hitting the film. That was why their vintage lens-cap’s hole was so narrow.

But modern mirrorless cameras like the X-T1 have minuscule lens-registration distances. This, and the fact that their lenses are small, meant that light coming through my original 1/3rd-diameter hole never even touched lens glass. I eventually determined that covering about 50% of the lens diameter was close to ideal. This article’s featured image shows the final lens cap in position on-camera:

Surprising Discoveries

My first test proved revealing:

First half-frame diptych of two bird collages shot individually but hanging from the same hook
“Communicating Birds (Plus Fish and Photographer)”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 1600, f/6.4, 1/30 sec.

These shots of my abstract paper-collages were taken one after the other, with each hanging from the same hook. It worked fairly well (if you ignore my reflection in the left frame).

But I also learned that blocking half of the incoming light for half-frame shots didn’t work well in auto-exposure mode. So this article’s half-frame images were all shot with the switch on the camera front set to Manual, and apertures, shutter speeds and ISOs also set manually with the camera’s physical controls.

More surprising, though: The location of the border between the half-frame mask and captured image and the border’s sharpness varied with aperture! For example, with Fuji’s 35mm f/1.4 lens, the following three captures show where this line fell in the viewfinder at (from left to right) f/1.4, f/4.5 and f/16):

Profiling shots of the half-frame diptych "divider" with Fuji's 35mm f/1.4 lens set at three aperturesAs I stopped down from 1.4 through 4.5 to 16, the dividing line between mask and image moved through the field from left to right, the border line became sharper, and the captured image area decreased. With f/4.5 being a decent half-way point. This allows one to produce half-frame results with paired images of equal or unequal area.

I saw similar effects with Fuji’s 18mm f/2 lens:

Profiling shots of the half-frame diptych "divider" with Fuji's 18mm f/2 lens set at three aperturesHere, the border line moved proportionately less as I stopped down from f/2 through f/5.6 to f/16. Probably because it’s a wider lens. For both lenses, though, f/16 created the sharpest frame division (probably because depth-of-field was greatest at f/16). And without a doubt, the 18mm lens at f/16 produced the sharpest division of all.

These interesting results meant that I could adjust ISOs, apertures and shutter speeds to control exposures, image areas captured, and whether the two half-frames are separated or blended. Lots of creative flexibility!

TIP: Fuji’s later X-T* models do multi-frame composites, as opposed to just half-frames. And I don’ t know if they behave like the X-T1. But to preview the above “final” position and sharpness effects before shooting, I needed to half-press the shutter button.

A Recommended Workflow

“Best” workflows will differ between cameras, but this worked well on the X-T1:

  1. Using the ring just below the top-deck ISO dial, set the camera’s drive mode to half-frame (the overlapped-rectangles icon just to the right of S).
  2. Confirm that the camera’s shooting mode is set to M (manual) on the switch by the lens. And that its ISO setting and shutter-speed are NOT set to A (automatic) on the top-deck dials.
  3. Turn the camera on.
  4. Looking in the viewfinder, rotate the lens mask to its approximate position for the first half-frame shot and roughly frame the first image in the visible field.
  5. Looking in the viewfinder, half-press the shutter button and adjust the ISO, aperture and shutter speed to get the framed image to a good size and exposure, AND move the lens mask’s edge where you want it. (Once you release the shutter button, the mask edge moves, but that’s OK.)
  6. Press the FOCUS ASSIST button on the camera back to magnify a portion of the image. On the X-T1, you’ll usually have to look for the button (it’s hard to find by touch).
  7. While still looking in the viewfinder, turn the lens focus ring until the viewfinder’s magnified patch looks sharpest.
  8. Half-press the shutter button to close the magnified view.
  9. While still looking in the viewfinder, with your left index finger (if you’re right-handed), rotate the lens mask to fine-tune its shooting position. (This is where the freely rotating mask ring is needed!)
  10. Re-frame the half-image within its area as needed.
  11. And shoot.
  12. If you like the result (including the sharpness and location of the frame’s dividing line), press the camera’s  MENU/OK button and proceed to step 13. But if you want to redo the shot, press the ring button to the left of MENU/OK and start again at step 5. NOTE: As long as the camera remains on and in double-exposure mode, your time to find and shoot a diptych’s second image is limited only by the camera’s battery. A small red light on the camera back blinks during this waiting period.
  13. When you find your second scene, rotate the lens-cap mask to its approximate new position (probably 180 degrees from the first location) and proceed from step 5.
  14. If you are happy with the second half-frame capture, press the MENU/OK button. The camera will merge and save the half-frames images. But if you want to redo the second shot, press the ring button to the left of MENU/OK and start again at step 5 to reshoot the second image.

NOTE: It may take a few passes through this process before you get used to the way the camera displays both the first committed shot and the second adjustable one. But this approach really helps one align or match features between both. And if what you see in the viewfinder for your second shot REALLY confuses you, the lens mask may still be in its first-shot position!

This workflow may sound complicated, but when you get used to it, it doesn’t take long at all. And though the above workflow is specific to the X-T1, the general idea should be adaptable to any double-exposing camera.

Pretty Nice Results!

As we’ll see below, this technique opens up some new half-frame applications. But first, here are three “traditional” diptychs (with the half-frame images shot beside each other):

Here’s a wholly in-camera version of an image “composited” using Photoshop in Part 1 of this article:

In-camera version of the "Escher's Bed Table" still life diptych that I "simulated" in Part 1 one of this article
“Escher’s Bed Table”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 500, f/5.6, 1/30 sec. What looks like dark vertical shading in the lampshades is actually this tall, narrow diptych’s vertical dividing line.
A ceiling diptych
“Abstract Ceiling”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 500, f/4, 1/30 sec. This shot was the first to show me that the division between half-frames is black because the lens-cap mask is blocking light. I may try a white mask disk… which might at least show up as lighter gray!
A "blended" diptych of stairs and a door "connected" to a closet wall in a different location
“Where’d THAT Door Come From?”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 1000, f.2.8, 1/30 sec. Here, I adjusted the ISO, aperture and shutter speed to (fairly) seamlessly blend a basement staircase and glass door with a row of closet doors in another location.

Next, five diptychs with images above and below each other:

Porch furniture "bent" using a non-blended dyptich
“Bent Furniture”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 500, f/6.4, 1/30 sec. Could one create this entirely in-camera with an Olympus Pen?
A blended diptych of three bathroom lights
“Abstract Bathroom Lights”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 200, f/2.2, 1/250 sec. Another blended diptych. The dark line in the middle is part of a mirror, not the frame divider.
Blended diptych of a stone path connected to a front porch in a different location
“Shifty Landscape”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 200, f/5, 1/60 sec. This blended diptych replaced a brick walkway to our front porch with a gravel path that’s out near the street. (My wife thought it was hysterical.)
Blended diptych of a stone wall and stop sign connected to trees in a different location
“How to Stop a Stone Wall”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 200, f/4, 1/180 sec. Here, I switched the camera to monochrome mode and blended a stone wall and hedge row in one location with a stop sign and distant trees in another. Note that the octagonal portion of the sign in the second location is perched atop a small tree trunk in he first. And the “dwarf” tree closer to the camera is actually a small treetop in the second location atop a bigger tree trunk in the first.
Blended diptych shots of two flower boxes on a deck rail
“Floating Garden”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 400, f/3.6, 1/50 sec. I shot this on our back deck, and am getting to LIKE blended in-camera diptychs!

Returning home from a photo walk, I realized that my lens cap could mask off full-frame-width panoramas:

A panorama shot with the Fuji 35mm f/1.4 lens
35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 200, f/2.8, 1/500 sec. I simply rotated the lens mask to block the top half of the viewfinder. And without shooting a second half-frame above this image, I turned the camera off. The dark blurry edge along the top is the dividing line above the first shot (which I did not crop out here).
A panorama shot with the Fuji 18mm f/2 lens
18mm f/2 Lens, ISO 200, f/2.8, 1/1000 sec. Further down the road, I liked this expanse behind our condo buildings. So I mounted Fuji’s 18mm lens and grabbed a wider view. (I cropped out most of the top dividing line here.)

Practice Makes (Pretty Close to) Perfect

As you see, the process may be quirky. But with practice, it became easy, fun and remarkably flexible. As further proof, consider the “Haunted Tree House” photo from my previous One-Shot Halloween Story. Its source image was the following diptych, produced in-camera at noon on a bright-overcast day:

The diptych source image for the next "Haunted Tree House" photo
35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 200, f/16, 1/30 sec. Due to my error, the captured images were underexposed and compressed into a narrow range of midtones. Normalizing their Levels, inverting tones, and boosting contrast just a bit quickly produced this haunting effect:
The "Haunted Tree House" image
“Haunted Tree House”  I hadn’t anticipated it. But when I inverted nature’s overhead illumination, I got supremely Halloweenish “underlighting.” Wish I could say I planned that. But I’ll certainly remember it!

And Finally, Something Really Different!

The rotating lens mask isn’t limited to just horizontally and vertically separated half-frames. It can also do diagonal separations at any angle. Here’s my first attempt, with the mask edge set at about 45 degrees (or 135 depending on from where you measure):

A "Bent Piano" diptych of half-frame images separated by a 45-degree division
“Bent Piano”  35mm f/1.4 lens, ISO 500, f/5, 1/30 sec.

And in the following slanted blend, the camera’s articulating LCD allowed me to take a look-up shot of deck-rail petunias, after which I turned around to shoot the building’s roof line:

A slanted blending of the building's roof line and nearby deck flowers.
“Where’d the Wall Go?” 18mm f/2 lens, ISO 200, f/2, 1/500 sec. I had rotated the lens mask just enough to align its blocking edge with the central roof line.

It was a surprising effect. If I’d shot the roof first and the flowers second, would the result been different? Must check that!

Some Final Thoughts

I love the fact that the only additional kit needed to create such a variety of images is a simple screw-on filter.

Though Fuji’s 35mm f/1.4 lens worked better for the images I had in mind, I want to do more with the 18mm lens.

And I’d like to use more diagonal separations within square images.

Perhaps a Part 3 is in the offing!

–Dave Powell is a Westford, Mass., writer and avid amateur photographer.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Dave Powell
Trained in mathematics, physics, computer programming and science journalism. Retired mathematician, award-winning technical and journalistic writer. Past winner of an international business-journalism equivalent of the Pulitzer Prize. And past author and editorial advisor for Sesame Street... where I regularly worked with Jim Henson and Kermit! Now enjoying "retirement studies" of photography, quantum physics and "scientific spirituality." (And restoring a shamefully lapsed relationship with the piano.)
Read More Articles From Dave Powell

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Martin on “Half Framing” Practically Any Camera (Part 2 of 2)

Comment posted: 08/11/2026

These are puzzling and Intriguing images, Dave. I am fascinated! Thanks for sharing!
Best regards
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *