So far this year, I have had significantly more film photography related fails than I have had good experiences. I’ve had overlapping exposures and at least a few issues with poorly exposing film. This time the issue was the product of shooting a new-to-me-lens on a new-to-me-camera whilst away for a couple of days on holiday just after lockdown. Annoying, but I have a digital fix!
I feel like I should know better. In fact, I do know better. I shot some film at a wedding not long ago, and because I wanted to use a camera and lens I hadn’t shot before, I shot a test roll cycling through shutter speeds and apertures to make sure they all worked as they should. Going on holiday, I didn’t think to do the same. In fact, I rarely shoot a test roll – daft considering I have a strong interest in avoiding potential problems or even subjectively positive serendipitous impacts on my photos. Instead, just like I usually do, I trusted my judgement when inspecting both camera and lenses without shooting a roll. Unfortunately, I was caught out by two issues that were entirely undetectable without film testing.
The camera and lens in question were a Contax Aria and a Zeiss 85mm f/1.4 – so we’re no talking cheap gear here either. Add to that the fact that I bought the camera from a trustworthy retailer and the lens from a mate, and I was pretty confident I was onto a winner. What could go wrong?
Well, as it turns out, the Aria has a dicky shutter. It’s ok for the most part, but at its highest speeds – maybe 1/2000th and 4000th – I get underexposure or a partially blacked out frames. I’ve spoken to a couple of repairers now, and it seems the shutter unit isn’t repairable either meaning it needs a spare part shutter – not easy to come by in 2021. In short, unless I can find another broken Aria with a different issue, I can’t shoot it with any confidence above 1/1000th. Annoying – but I suppose part of the risk of buying such electronically reliant film cameras these days.
The lens is even more frustrating too – not to mention a little confusing. Since I’ve discovered the issue I’ve sent some photos to the chap I bought it off to see if he recognised it as something he’d seen any hint of in his photos. By return he sent me a load of images that didn’t have the issue and that he’d taken not long before sending it to me. What’s all the more frustrating is that I’ve been on a bit of a short tele-lens kick recently, so whilst on holiday I took a lot of the photos with the 85mm lens. And that’s not to mention the fact that the issue only happens when the lens is shot stopped down, and being as I was on holiday taking photos on beaches and on walks on hills in the sunshine, I shot almost everything at f/8.
The issue presents itself as a large blob of low contrast middle. The more stopped down, the smaller and more distinct it gets. Wide open it disappears entirely. At f/8 it’s big enough to take up quite a bit of the frame and distinct enough to be hard to get rid of. What makes this confusing is there is very little sign of anything issue in the lens that could be causing this. There’s no haze at all, and I can’t see any sign of paint on the internal surfaces failing. So yeah, it’s now a mystery for Chris at Skylanney to solve for me at some point.
Anyway… in the end, I whittled the photos down to the few I took with either the 50 or 28mm lenses, ones the blob was less of an issue on and I was able to remove with some local dehaze in Lightroom, and a couple that I couldn’t fix perfectly, but I wanted to keep the image anyway. I’m sure if they were vitally important, I could do a slightly better job, but as it is, I’m happy enough with the outcome in the end – which is I guess all that matters in the end, right…?
I suppose you might think the tedious Lightroom fix of the few images I wanted to save here is the “digital fix” I mentioned at the top? I actually think I could – were I to feel inclined – use this as an opportunity to make some smug argument for the benefits of having a digital aspect to film photography processes. Afterall, this issue would be even more difficult to fix outside of software.
I can’t be bothered with all that though. In honesty, as I have talked about recently, I don’t shoot film with any anticipation that anything like this is going to go wrong anyway. And I certainly didn’t feel smug about my hybrid workflow choices when slaving over Lightroom trying to save a couple of these photos from looking totally crap. Quite the opposite, I just felt annoyed at myself for not testing the camera and lens first. I also just regretted shooting film. I had, in fact, originally intended to take a digital camera, but talked myself into a film camera knowing I was likely to go to the beach with it – I like shooting film cameras on the beach, and always get a couple of shots I really like, the one of Connie above and this one below being case in point.
But, I’m not going to the beach for a little while again now… Which leads me neatly to my actual “digital fix”. For the time being at least, I’m not just going to use digital software to fix any of my film photos that might go wrong in the way these did. Instead, I’m just going to shoot more digital. Me and film photography haven’t fallen out for good, but after all the balls-ups this year so far, I’m going to lean on digital as my first choice for a bit. I’ve been enjoying my little Sony NEX-5R, as well as getting a lot more out of shooting the Sony A7iii I retired from work a few months ago – so why not commit to the digital cause a bit more…?
Afterall I suppose, this has to be the benefit of being both a film and digital photographer. When digital get mundane (as it tends to for me eventually), I can shoot film. And when film makes me want to scoop all my film cameras into a skip and set the lot of them on fire (as I currently feel), I can take a break and shoot digital for a bit.
Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-free Experience
There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:
Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you'll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).
Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.
21 thoughts on “A Film Photography Fail with a Digital Fix”
Amen – having a choice between digital and film is only adding useful tools. I’ll never quite get the purism where everything film is deemed a waste and a fad, nor the purism where the only possibility with film is printing, because scanners are already too digital. I mean, people can make the choice for such purism, but judging others by that yardstick is just silly.
In the end, it’s about making images the way you want to, and coming to results you like. Choice of camera, film, printing or online sharing, all just personal choices. So let’s enjoy the freedom of choice 🙂
I admire your skill at getting the blob into places where it doesn’t matter- the dog didn’t seem too bothered, and that’s the sign of a true pro.
I note you confirmed that it was pukka kit. My Kiev leaks light like a sieve at 1/25s and slower and I don’t trust it fully at 1/50- so I avoid those speeds, which informs film choice as much as anything. A lot of my kit is pretty shonky, and a bit like elderly dogs has to be stage-managed to get the charm without a messy disaster.
Which is part of the fun – when you know how to avoid/harness the issues. This totally caught me unaware ????
Hamish, some years ago I owned a 1974 Leica 90mm Tele-Elmarit which occasionally gave a similar image to the lens you have been using. I read somewhere online at that time that someone else had experienced a similar problem and pinpointed it to internal flair, even when using a lens hood. The writer claimed it was a known issue. My lens, now sold, was in loverly condition and showed no problems, it was very sharp too. I hope yours get sorted.
Cheers, I’m sure I’ll find out what’s causing it. It does seem that some sort of internal reflection is likely
I feel your pain. I have definitely done the same taking an untested camera out for a maiden voyage, so to speak, to only later find it had/has “issues”.
Is it possible the aperture/iris blades are momentarily/briefly sticking, like a pause, as they close then releasing causing an over exposure? If the blobs are different sizes then that might be explained by different apertures. I’m no camera expert, very amateur, but since it can happen on different cameras that’s all I can think of.
Don’t let it kill your film shooting, just grab a different cameras and lend and push forward!
It looks like flare caused by reflecting light off the film hitting the back of the lens. Because it is not general but circle, I would suggest issue with lens element on side of iris away from the film towards the front.
I’m sure this won’t help, and I probably should avoid saying it BUT unless you want to spend HIGH and go Leica, why not stick
with Nikon film cameras from the F all the way up to the F6 and ALL points in between with any and all manual and auto lenses?
How can you go wrong? And avoid the kind of issues this posting illustrates? Bad shutter and unrepairable and weird (expensive) lens behavior? No to say there aren’t other great film cameras out there and obviously you know them ALL or most…After writing I
feel bound to apologize…Did you ever think of Bessa RFs for instance…I’m sure you have–they’re really NICE!
Sorry and thanks for 35mmc!
I have – for now at least – chosen the life of a film-camera-blogger. I’ve had most of the cameras you mention at one time or another. I continue to explore more, as it’s what I write about
Awww, c’mon! If it ain’t perfect, just call it “artistic” ! ????
Hamish, that central contrast blob looks a lot like what happens in infrared photography with some lenses. If the film you’re using is especially sensitive to infrared and you’ve got no IR filters on the lens, you may be seeing this “hot spot” effect. I’ve seen it with a friend’s Nikon IR-converted digital camera. Only happens with some lens designs.
Yeah, it does a bit – unfortunately this lens is doing it for visible light photography at the moment, with little clue as to why
Solution: always take two film cameras with you at all times (and use them both at all times). Hell, I sometimes take three cameras, just for a day out. If I was actually going away on holiday, it would be more like four or five!
“digital as a first choice for a bit”.. absolute heresy! ????
Oh no, that stresses me out – one camera is the maximum for me. I shall be a heretic then ????
A-ah! I’ve had a similar blob in the middle on my Bessa R! The problem in my case was a scratch of the black matte paint inside the “chamber” that links the lens to the shutter plane (I hope that’s clear) that caused some light reflections when the light was coming at the right, or should I say wrong, angle.
Do you have the same issue? 🙂
Yeah, that was something I though – but I can’t see anything that could catch the light anywhere inside the lens
Mine was in the camera, not in the lens. It could be under the mirror.
In this case it’s the lens. The lens does it on my digital, and other lenses didn’t do it on this camera
Ah, it’s an art lens then 😉