BlackBox 135 review

BlackBox 135 Digitisation Tool Review

By Geoff Chaplin

Conclusion: easy to set up, easy to use, superb results. If you have a digital camera and macro lens then for 35mm film scanning forget the flatbed scanner. Their website is blackscalelab.com. If you need to know more read on.

Anyone who has worked with computers for a while knows that the first thing you should do when you get new equipment is chuck the manuals in the bin. And so I assembled the items in the box. Note that the BlackBox manual is sensibly given as a link to the manual online.

BlackBox 135 review
Contents of the delivery box

Most items in the image are self explanatory. The group of four in the top right need a little explanation. The two in the upper row are extension tubes. Lower left are lens rings. From the latter set I chose a ring to screw into the front of my lens. From the former set I chose extension tubes to enable my lens to focus on the screen. Which tubes you need will depend on your lens and is a matter of trial and error to (a) get the lens to focus and (b) to fill as much of the sensor as possible.

During assembly I noticed a couple of threads of plastic inside the tube from manufacture – just pull these off if you have any. Also doing things quickly just to see if it worked I did not choose an optimal set of rings so my illustrated scan comparison below was based on using only 60% of the sensor.

BlackBox 135 review
Two extension tubes are attached to the base. The tubes to the right are no longer needed.

The other piece (lower right in the first image – I’ll call the “Connector”) clicks into the extension tubes and enables the camera lens to sit on top making a complete tower, light bed at the base, camera at the top. NOTE: this is just a gravity lock between lens and tubes – don’t tilt the set-up but keep it in a vertical position. This means of attachment allows the camera to be rotated freely to line up with the film.

BlackBox 135 review
Lens ring (attached), connector and unused lens rings

The Connector is pictured with the side attaching to the extension tubes uppermost, the lens slotting into the other side.

Film sits on the film holder and slides into the base with click stops for each of the six frames. You need to plug the cable and switch one end into the base, the other into a 5 volt charger. At first I tried a low power charger – this doesn’t work, the light will just flash on then off.

BlackBox 135 review
View from above

I used my Sigma 105mm macro lens on a Sony A7Riii body. For my first shot I chose an image which is featured in my article “Drinking Districts in Japan VII: Obihiro” the image of Cow Brand soap advertising sign on a crumbling wall. I scanned using a 10s shutter delay, stabilisation off, aperture mode, AF, and (accidentally) at f13. I show below crops from about 10% by area of the entire image, the original Epson GT-X900 scan from a 30mb tif file (3200 dpi scanning), and the 12mb jpg scan from BlackBox. The latter is strikingly better.

BlackBox 135 review
Flatbed scan (detail)
BlackBox 135 review
BlackBox scan (detail)

I scanned one entire film (40 frames) and it took under 10 minutes (much less with a 5s delay) – about an hour and a half less than my flatbed scanner. So at this point I decided to look at the manual to see what I might have messed up. I shot jpg since I was scanning B&W – for colour I’d use RAW but I also realised later my workflow using RawTherapee would be simplified if I’d shot B&W as RAW – tone inversion could be performed with one click at the start. F5.6 would probably be the best choice for this lens. Exposure compensation was set at zero – BlackBox suggests checking the histogram and adjusting exposure appropriately. I scanned the film with the negative side down. Talking to Dmitry it seems negative side up is theoretically better though in practice it doesn’t seem to matter.

I have since scanned about 20 B&W films at f8 or f5.6 often without exposure compensation. As before everything worked quickly and efficiently with consistently exceptionally good results. A tip if you shoot more than 36 frames: it’s difficult to scan short pieces of film. Cut your film 6 frames at a time starting from the end. When you get to the start leave an amount of the over-exposed leader simply to enable easy loading into the film holder. Also after scanning I suggest you convert from film negative (to positive), make B&W (it seems always to have a colour cast), straighten and crop, set the contrast curve to a straight line (not an auto-matched tone curve or other adjustment at this stage), and save as a jpg. Subsequent adjustments if desired are best made on the jpg file.

I have no connection with blackscalelabs other than having bought this product.

 

 

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Geoff Chaplin
Primarily a user of Leica film cameras and 8x10 for the past 30 years, recently a mix of film and digital. Interests are concept and series based art work. Professionally trained in astronomical photography, a scientist and mathematician.
View Profile

Comments

Gary Smith on BlackBox 135 Digitisation Tool Review

Comment posted: 23/05/2024

Geoff, initially I was confused as to why your scan was only 12mb but then I checked jpg's from my 7R3 and they're about the same. I don't have a macro lens for my e-mount Sony but I've been thinking of taking the plunge so I can scan my own film (which I'm gradually realizing that I'm going to have to start developing myself again). Thanks for showing us your rig!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin replied:

Comment posted: 23/05/2024

Thanks Gary. I guess if you are venturing into this area there are two aspects - how to scan (RAW or jpg, emulsion up or down) and how to process the scans. I use free software, primarily RaeTherapee also GIMP sometimes. Processing is actually quite simple - straighten, crop, contrast adjust.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on BlackBox 135 Digitisation Tool Review

Comment posted: 26/05/2024

I think The flatbed scan is so much nicer
It lacks the detail and resolution but its smooth, softer and pleasing to the eye.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin replied:

Comment posted: 26/05/2024

I understand but with a digital scan you have the choice - grain and detail or with an adjustment of the "impulse noise reduction" slider smooth and grain free (but less detail).

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 26/05/2024

That’s true And it’s also quicker to scan once set up

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *