Rollei Blackbird Creative Film

By Tony Warren

I recently received a roll of this film in substitution for an out of stock order. I had never heard of it until then and it turns out to be another film with the rather contradictory description of orthopanchromatic.

Rollei’s literature describes the film as…”an orthopanchromatic high contrast film. As a b&w creative film it can be exposed from ISO 25/15º to ISO 100/21º with a nominal sensitivity of ISO 64/19º. The images are characterised by phenomenal sharpness, finest light transmission and charismatic contrasts.” It also gives further information and detailed processing times and developers. Extremely high resolution at low sensitivity is claimed.

The previous film I had tried that had the orthopanchromatic description had been Adox CMS II Pro when I had found that the only the red filter had any noticeable effect on tone reproduction and then only by cutting through haze. Learning from the Adox I decided to use it without any filters. Rating it at ISO 100 led me to expect it would not have such harsh contrast. These emulsions I gather are based on security film which accounts for the wide tonal response and clarity.

I decided I would shoot in sunny, early autumn light because I liked the results I had had with the Adox in similar conditions. It may well perform differently in other light and speed ratings.

Processing

Helpfully, details of development in various solutions are printed on the inside of the box once opened out. My Rodinal is there, 11 minutes at 1:50 dilution and 21 ºC. It can be exposed at speeds between ISO 25 and ISO 100 depending on the developer in use.

I had some difficulty loading it into my tank, caused I believe by the Canon 7 I was using taking up the film emulsion side out, the reverse of the usual, giving it a slight set that curled the end outwards, binding slightly on the spiral. It is a very slippery material though and should not be a problem with conventional winding.

The other thing is the film base which needs scissors to seperate the film from the cassette. It is a very clear, tough polyester material I believe and doesn’t tear across the cassette lip, my usual method with more usual bases.

I took a nicely exposed film out of the tank so the Canon’s meter is accurate. One gap of several frames was due to me leaving the lens cap on! My feeble excuse is that I was shooting it after using an SLR.

In the camera

I shot the film in my Canon 7 using the Industar 26M for all these examples.

Door head detail of Larnach’s tomb, Dunedin’s Northern Cemetery.
Door head detail of Larnach’s tomb, Dunedin’s Northern Cemetery.
Spire detail of Larach’s tomb.
Spire detail of Larach’s tomb.
A shady spot in Dunedin’s Northern Cemetery. The film is capable of capturing the finest detail.
A shady spot in Dunedin’s Northern Cemetery. The film is capable of capturing the finest detail.
Northern Cemetery again.
Northern Cemetery again.

With less contrasty scenes a full tone range is possible, excellent for architectural record.

A comparison between the two - Adox left, Blackbird right.
A comparison between the two – Adox left, Blackbird right.

And overall and at this speed rating it is much less contrasty than the Adox CMS II Pro. It does give a kind of micro contrast that brings up detail quite strongly.

The entrance to Dunedin’s Chinese Gardens. This and another frame showed quite a lot of flare from the lens. This is the only one saveable but only after considerable post work. Clearly a lens hood should always be used with this lens for safety.
The entrance to Dunedin’s Chinese Gardens. This and another frame showed quite a lot of flare from the lens. This is the only one saveable but only after considerable post work. Clearly a lens hood should always be used with this lens for safety.
Detail of Forsyth Barr Stadium.
Detail of Forsyth Barr Stadium.

One of its strengths has to be architectural subjects where the tone range and detail rendition comes out so well.

Entrance detail, Chapman’s’s Terrace, Stuart Street, Dunedin.
Entrance detail, Chapman’s’s Terrace, Stuart Street, Dunedin.
Chapman Terrace, Stuart Street, Dunedin.
Chapman Terrace, Stuart Street, Dunedin.

Closing comment

This film has a distinctive character and is certainly less demanding than the Adox mentioned which has similar, if more extreme, characteristics. It allows quite extensive manipulation beyond simple, full tone rendering I have tried to bring out with the feature image. It responds well in Rodinal rated at ISO 100 producing fine, even grain which can become visible in even toned areas. It renders skies well without filtration.

Probably this would be best shot in colour, but the negative allowed me to emphasise the autumnal leaves on the tree and the branches echoing the roof shapes plus giving a little depth.
Probably this would be best shot in colour, but the negative allowed me to emphasise the autumnal leaves on the tree and the branches echoing the roof shapes plus giving a little depth.

I can see why it was decided to call it Rollei Blackbird. The blacks in the results have that intense, very solid inky black seen on a blackbird’s plumage.

Currently only available in 35mm but with such high level of performance probably doesn’t need to go larger. I suspect my ageing Industar lens is not doing it justice and it may suit other styles of photography more than mine.

I am tending to favour Rollei’s Superpan and Retro films these days. Like this film, they render skies well without filtration, so two less glass surfaces between the subject and film is a good thing. And one less thing to lose. Still, for more specialised purposes it is a film to have in mind, especially architecture as I have said.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Tony Warren
In my 60 or so years of serious involvement in photography I have seen the demise of the viewfinder, the rise of the SLR and the eclipse of them all with the meteoric development of the digital camera. Through it all, however, and above all else, the image is what it is all about so I now use film alongside digital. Whatever is the most appropriate or practical. My contributions will hopefully be useful for anyone interested in using film and also how a died-in-the-wool antique like me is continuing his life-long addiction in the digital age, using both platforms. The major benefit of an extended retirement is that I can spend most of my time nowadays with photography and writing about it.
Read More Articles From Tony Warren

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Simon Foale on Rollei Blackbird Creative Film

Comment posted: 26/05/2026

Thanks for this informative review Tony. Do you think there is anything this film can do that Aviphot Pan 80 (e.g. Retro 80) can't?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 26/05/2026

Thank you Simon. Coincidentally I have just shot a roll of Retro 80 in 120 and I would say there is quite a difference. The lower values are much more intense and give a richness with Blackbird I haven't seen before. It is well named. The article by Scott Ferguson's a week or so ago was mainly portraits and the skin tones he captured had the same richness and depth I have seen with my subjects. I would like to try it in 120 but only 35mm at present.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Rollei Blackbird Creative Film

Comment posted: 26/05/2026

According to a general query on the net, the Rollei Blackbird film is manufactured by Hans O. Mahn & CO. KG (Maco), which has secured the rights to the "Rollei" name. A significant portion of the films under this brand, including the Rollei Blackbird, is produced by Agfa-Gevaert in Belgium.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 26/05/2026

Thanks or that Gary. Maco have been around a long time I seem tp remember.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Omar Tibi on Rollei Blackbird Creative Film

Comment posted: 26/05/2026

Nice review Tony! I wonder if this is an Agfa copy film at heart. Your results remind me of Ferrania Orto, if you liked Blackbird I'd recommend you to give it a try - also without any color filtering! Happy shooting and wishing you a very fun and photo filled summer.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 26/05/2026

Thank you Omar. Gary has answered your origin question I think. The Ferrania film I assume is an orthochromatic from the name so will be similar to the Ilford Ortho I tried a while ago. This Blackbird is similar to the Adox CMS I reviewed more recently, also described as orthopanchromatic. These emulsions have a fairly unique character and this one, exposed as it can be at ISO 25, could produce similar results to the Adox, which had a very limited tone range, maybe 4 stops or so. It would appear the speed rating dictates its performance and can tolerate quite a variance. Unfortunately, we are a few weeks away from the winter solstice down here in New Zealand but I still get out with my cameras now and then.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens on Rollei Blackbird Creative Film

Comment posted: 27/05/2026

Excellent work and a helpful, interesting review. I can’t contribute much myself; my active days of developing my own film were decades ago and were limited to Agfa, Ilford and Kodak films and chemicals. Okay, Tetanal was added to the mix. When I read this, make a concerted effort to trace the origins of these specialist films – where I’m sometimes met with outright resistance – and listen to the opinions of two leading laboratories here in Germany, it seems this can only work with a customised development process. Both laboratories generally refuse to accept, for example, Adox films on PET base. The others develop them using the standard process. And the new analogue photographer rejoices, only to get mediocre results for a lot of money. But he doesn’t realise it, and the forum members who know better lack the courtesy to tell the truth.
MACO has been in existence for decades and is a wholesaler of photographic products that acquired the Rollei brand rights in 2004. It does not produce its own films; all Rollei films are sourced from various suppliers and packaged in-house. The Rollei Blackbird is an aerial photography film and is produced by Agfa-Gevaert in Belgium.

Don’t get me wrong, the film is fine, and so is your processing technique, as you can see from the results. If I were to rely on a standard modern lab workflow, I’d get a negative for €14 per 36-exposure roll that’s similar to FOMAPAN 100 Classic, which costs less than half the price. To put it simply, you can only achieve this level of quality by developing the film yourself. Thanks for sharing.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 27/05/2026

Thank you Walter. I remember Maco fromway back but i can't remember what I bought from them now after, probably 30+ years. I agree with your comments regarding lab processing today. Much of what I achieve is inpost processing I must confess. My initial scan/copy is similar to some lab results. I have a piece on the subject to be published here shortly. Your information on Blackbird confirms a lot of its qualities as it is an aerial film. The clarity/haze penetration and the well defined dark tones that would be needed explain much of its character. Thanks again.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RichardH on Rollei Blackbird Creative Film

Comment posted: 27/05/2026

Thank you for showing us what this Rollei Blackbird film can produce, Tony. I am inspired by the tonality and detail of your work. The Larach’s Tomb spire photo is amazing! It has qualities of medium format.
I have tried the Adox CMS II stock with Rodinal 1:50, but the grain dominated my results. I will look for some of this Blackbird stock.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 27/05/2026

As I said in the article, with results like these from 35mm there seems little pint in offering it in a larger format. And Rodinal isn't an especially fine grain developer so result in something finer should be near 5x4 quality with a good lens. I tried the Adox a while back but didn't find the grain too bad. I didn't process for a full tone range though, just accepted that it gave only 4 stops or so tone range. Many of these recent films recommend a dedicated developer but Rodinal is pretty good and flexible with most things. Thanks for the comment.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scott Ferguson on Rollei Blackbird Creative Film

Comment posted: 28/05/2026

Thanks for this article which shows excellent results with Rollei Blackbird, a film I've tried a number of times over the last year with varying success in my predominant style, street photography with a strong focus on portraits. I think you've managed to get it to very pleasing results that take advantage of the strong inky blacks, but not to get swallowed by them, as some of my early attempts did -- which look a little closer to your Adox image. I don't know much about the Industar, curious what it's inherent qualities might be, especially in terms of contrast -- my higher contrast lenses weren't as successful in getting any subtlety in the skin tones with Blackbird, sometimes I got a very interesting effect with what I call a "black glow" but it was very hit or more often miss. I do feel like I may have 'cracked the code' when I paired Blackbird with a relatively low contrast vintage lens, in my case a 1957 Leica Summarit 50mm f1.5.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 28/05/2026

Thanks Scott. Your description of a "black glow" really comes out in your portraits. Mid range tones seem to have a depth that other films lack. Your recent article pairing the film with the Summarit brought this out so well and I would imagine my Industar might produce similar results but not quite up to Leitz standards. It seems to be a 4 group design from the reflections so may have five elements, not sure about that, but apart from tendency to flare as pretty sharp.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on Rollei Blackbird Creative Film

Comment posted: 28/05/2026

Another excellent review Tony, you've managed to get almost everything out of this film with your careful knowledge of zones and making the film shine.
I personally would avoid this now, once I would've jumped at it as was a fan of Rollei Retro 80s.
I think either Fuji Acros 100 or Ilford Pan F would give almost as inky black but still manage to keep highlights in check.
This reminds me of the Sverna film I used once
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Warren replied:

Comment posted: 28/05/2026

Thanks Ibraar. One thing I have taken from Ansel Adams pronouncements is consistency. So whatever floats your boat. I enjoy trying out various things but if I was still into serious stuff I would be stick to one or two films and, probably, medium format. I have a liking for Rollei films these days alongside FP4+. Their ability to render skies in particular I find very appealing. I agree the blacks can be as deep with older formulations depending on exposure and processing but I have the feeling that this Blackbird film has a more individual quality in the results. It is a bit ephemeral though and isn't there all the time, as I think Scott Ferguson has found too.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain replied:

Comment posted: 28/05/2026

That it has, you've made the film show its qualities, and this is exactly what I think it was made for

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *