Uncategorized

My First Roll of 110 since the 90s – Lomography 110 Tiger Film

July 1, 2022

Back over Easter we went on holiday in my wife’s van around the west and north of wales. I used 3 cameras whilst we were travelling the Sony ZV-1, a Hasselblad SWC and a Pentax 110 auto. I’ve already reviewed the Sony, and have some thoughts to share about both the Pentax and Hasselblad at some point, though I’m not quite ready on either count just yet. In the meanwhile, I thought it might be nice to write about the first roll of 110 film I’ve shot since the 90s!

The last time I shot 110 film must have been in the 90s, though I can’t really remember what year, it would have been early 90s. My nan bought me my first camera, a Nikon RF10, when I was 9 in 1992, and I know it was sometime after that as I already had the interest in photography when I tried the 110 camera. That camera I shot has a bit of a back story too, which is perhaps why I remember it so well.

I used to get a bus back from school and used to chat to a couple of the drivers. One in particular, Chris, used to share Polo mints with the kids and he used to keep them in a little cup holder under the window to the right of his seat. I got on the bus one day and in the process of trying to scrounge a mint spotted a small black case. I asked Chris what it was and he told me it was a camera that someone had left on the bus. Being cheeky, I asked him if I could have it. Of course the answer was no, but he said that if no one claimed it in six months, which was their lost property policy, I could indeed have it. I seem to remember regularly asking him if the six months had passed – I bet it was even more regularly than I remember too. Six months eventually did pass, and one day he presented me with this camera. It was small, very light, very plasticky, red and black in colour, and definitely a 110 camera.

I shot a couple of rolls with it too, and though the photos are long gone I remember growing quickly tired with how totally unreliable it was. It was certainly less reliable than my little Nikon which was little more complex than a disposable, but worked perfectly for me most of the time. The results that came out from the 110 left a lot to be desired – they were grainy and muddy, what I now understand to be underexposed.

It wasn’t long before my young inquisitive mind decided to dismantle it – I used to love taking stuff apart when I was a kid. In fact, I have a particularly vivid memory of taking this camera apart with a little screwdriver in a cafe in a town near where I used to live. I’ve no idea why I had a screwdriver, or what happened to the bits of camera, but suffice to say that was the end of my relationship with 110. Or at least it was until recently.

Since then, I have had a negative attitude toward the format. The surface area of film you shoot with a 110 camera is dramatically smaller than that of a 35mm frame. It’s even smaller than APS film. The result of this is, of course, more perceptible grain when you enlarge your images. Growing up in the latter part of the film era and early part of the digital era, grain isn’t something I have ever really sought out. I don’t mind a little bit, but where the are options to reduce it, I’d tend to err toward them. This combined with previous negative experiences of 110 film, albeit ones from a good few years ago, have meant that I’ve never really had any desire to shoot it.

What changed? Well, as is often the case with me, I wasn’t motivated to shoot a particular type of film, instead I fancied a particular camera. In this case, the camera was a Pentax 110 auto. I’ve seen these cameras in the flesh a good few times, and always liked the look of them. They’re tiny, but somehow manage to have really nice, big, clear viewfinders. I’d never bitten the bullet and bought one though. In fact, I didn’t buy the one I ended up shooting – Josh who used to work for pixl-latr bought a pair he spotted on eBay going for a small amount of cash. He asked if I wanted one of them, and I couldn’t say no.

It was then I got in touch with Hannah from Lomography UK to ask her thoughts on the available films they stocked. She replied very kindly offering me a couple of rolls to shoot. This roll of Tiger was the first I loaded. In fact, I made a little instagram reel of me loading it – I loaded whilst on the way to Wales in my wife’s big van. I then shot it over the course of the trip. And you know what? The whole experience was a lot more positive than I would have ever expected.

Wales Easter 22

For a start, the little Pentax was a dream to shoot. It’s tiny, so I could take it everywhere. It came with a couple of lenses too, a 24mm (~50mm equivalent) and an 18mm (~35mm equivalent) – I shot it all with the little 18mm focus free lens meaning I could just snap away without having to think about focusing, something I always enjoy. I must admit, I wasn’t convinced the photos were going to be that great. In fact, this actually added to my enjoyment when snapping. I just took the shots with little concern for the outcome. Of course, when they came out really nicely, it was even more of a nice surprise.

Wales Easter 22

Wales Easter 22

Wales Easter 22

Wales Easter 22

Wales Easter 22

Wales Easter 22

It’s true, they are a fair bit more grainy than 35mm film photos. They’re also softer than images I get out of equivalent 35mm lenses on a 35mm camera. But actually, the images have a real charm to them. They’re well exposed and have a warm tone that I really like. Dare I say, they almost feel nostalgic too… which is a word I don’t often associate with film since I’ve never really not shot it. They just have that look of older film images – the sort you might find in a parents photo album or the like. I suppose it’s entirely possibly that a part of this is due to the fact that I took them on holiday too. They have personal, positive feelings associated with them – the grain and image warmth add to that.

In short, I’m really chuffed with them. I’ve already bought myself a couple of extra rolls of Lomography Tiger film, and have been so encouraged by the experience that I’ve bought another lens for the Pentax 110. Before I get on to the other rolls of Tiger, I have a roll of Metropolis (which I have shot and enjoyed before) and a roll of Orca black & white too. I honestly never thought I would shoot this film format again, but I am pleased I have given it a go… I’m not pleased about the GAS I now have for more 110 cameras though…

 

Thanks again to Lomography UK for the film. You can find their range of 110 film on their website here. It’s also worth noting they are doing a little bit of promo for the 110 from June 29 – July 6th. Share your best 110 photos on social media with the hashtag #EasyLomoAnalogue and they will pick a winner who gets 10EUR/USD coupon for their online shop.

Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience

There are two ways to experience 35mmc without the adverts:

Paid Subscription - £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial)
Subscribe here

Content contributor - become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.
Sign up here.

14 Comments

  • Reply
    Martin
    July 1, 2022 at 10:48 am

    I do like shooting 110. The cameras are not intimadating people (OK, maybe the original Minolta 110 Zoom SLR is a bit) mostly easy to carry and some a remarably well items of everyday use. You just snap on P&S at its finest.

  • Reply
    Keith Devereux
    July 1, 2022 at 1:05 pm

    I really must load some Tiger into my Minolta Zoom 110 SLR.

  • Reply
    Terry B
    July 1, 2022 at 1:46 pm

    A lovely mini-portfolio of family “snaps”, Hamish, of the sort the vast majority of us took in the 1950’s when a trip to the seaside was an event. People were happy with a few photos recording themselves in family mementos. And now, looking back, how innocent they appear to us.

    I’ve seen some excellent examples of Tiger 110 on the internet, usually shot in a top 110, and usually quite sophisticated, camera of the day from the likes of Agfa with their Color-Solinars, the Canon 110 rangefinder, Minolta and Rokkors, Pentax 110, and the Rollei A110 with Tessars. The problem is the film format, and not even being equipped with high quality lenses could this be satisfactorily overcome unless one was happy to accept the inevitable compromise on IQ.

  • Reply
    Gordon R. Brown
    July 1, 2022 at 4:05 pm

    Where was the 110 film processed?

  • Reply
    sonny rosenberg
    July 1, 2022 at 4:57 pm

    I guess I’ve always discounted 110 as not a “real” film format, I think there was some almost reasonable basis to this prejudice. I have to say though, these photos are quite nice.
    Hopefully the 110 bug that you’ve now put in the back of my mind will go away and I won’t end up buying another camera. I have admired those tiny Pentax 110s before though.

  • Reply
    Ted
    July 1, 2022 at 6:56 pm

    I enjoyed this piece Hamish.
    A few months back an old work mate gave me a couple old Canon 35mm rangefinder cameras he no longer wanted but to my surprise in the box of cameras etc was the little Pentax Auto 110 with 3 lenses. I too liked th e look of the tiny Pentax but no sooner had I gotten the cameras then they were pit aside and forgotten. Getting the film is no problem but getting it processed and scanned is another. I looked into getting a 110 reel for the developing tank but those I found were far to expensive for a camera which would only be used on rare occasions. Your article has renewed my desire to play with the 110. Thanks !

    • Reply
      Hamish Gill
      July 2, 2022 at 1:26 pm

      Excellent! I’ve been GASing all morning for a Rollei… damned slippery slopes…

  • Reply
    davesurrey
    July 2, 2022 at 4:04 pm

    From the 1970s to the 90s I did a large amount of travel to many interesting countries. But so often I didn’t have space for my Olympus OM1/2 kit and lenses. So I bought a Pentax Auto 110 on the basis it’s better to have any camera than none at all. It was a good decision.

    The problem was the processing tended to be poor as most 110 film was shot with crappy 110 cameras and IMO many labs didn’t take much care compared with 135 or 120.

    Fast forward to 2022 and added to the Pentax 110 and all the lenses they made for it I have a Minolta Zoom 2, Canon110ED, Kodak Ektramax, Rollei A100 and a Voigtlander Vitoret…plus a few cheap snapmatics.

    Not surprisingly they hardly get used nowadays but my favourite is still the little Pentax.
    It’s the one that allowed me to capture so many memories of places that I will never return to.

    I’ve some Lomo and Fukkatsu 110 film languishing in my freezer so perhaps it’s time to take it out.

  • Reply
    davesurrey
    July 2, 2022 at 4:05 pm

    From the 1970s to the 90s I did a large amount of travel to many interesting countries. But so often I didn’t have space for my Olympus OM1/2 kit and lenses. So I bought a Pentax Auto 110 on the basis it’s better to have any camera than none at all. It was a good decision. The problem was the processing tended to be poor as most 110 film was shot with crappy 110 cameras and IMO many labs didn’t take much care compared with 135 or 120.

    Fast forward to 2022 and added to the Pentax 110 and all the lenses they made for it I have a Minolta Zoom 2, Canon110ED, Kodak Ektramax, Rollei A100 and a Voigtlander Vitoret…plus a few cheap snapmatics.

    Not surprisingly they hardly get used nowadays but my favourite is still the little Pentax.
    It’s the one that allowed me to capture so many memories of places that I will never return to.

    I’ve some Lomo and Fukkatsu 110 film languishing in my freezer so perhaps it’s time to take it out.

  • Reply
    Scott Gitlin
    July 3, 2022 at 10:17 pm

    The landscapes have a nice painting-like quality due to the grain.

  • Reply
    Orrin
    July 4, 2022 at 1:14 am

    I’ve only shot one roll in my Auto 110 that I got a few months back. However, I enjoyed the camera and the results. Hoping I get the chance to use it more next month.

  • Reply
    Karen
    July 4, 2022 at 8:14 pm

    I have the Pentax 110 but I have never used it. I mount the lenses on my MFT camera instead . I have the 70mm lens for the Pentax 110 and it is one of the nicest lenses I have ever shot. With my MFT adapter I can only ever use it wide open as there is not aperture in the lens. If you have a chance to soot one give it a go. You won’t be disappointed.

  • Reply
    Huss
    July 4, 2022 at 8:39 pm

    Not that I would encourage GAS or anything, but the two 110 cameras I use are the fantastic Rollei A110, and the also fantastic Pentax Auto 110.
    The thing about the Rollei is the solid metal build and tiny size. It feels like a spy camera! Incredible Tessar lens that you focus (symbols in the VF), auto program exposure w shutter speeds from 4 sec to 1/400!
    Also – it can use the modern battery equivalent as the electronics compensate for the difference, so no need to worry! Just use a 6V s27PX.
    It’s also really fun to use w/ flashcubes (ebay) which give shockingly good results.

    Huge 110 thread here on Photrio.com

    https://www.photrio.com/forum/threads/110-16mm-camera-image-quality.180063/page-37

    The key to quality images is scanning the film yourself. I use my digicam scanning system that I use for 35mm and 120 aswell.

Leave a Reply

This site uses User Verification plugin to reduce spam. See how your comment data is processed.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience -Click here to find out more
+