A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

By Hamish Gill

I took my Pentax Q7 for a couple of Christmassy evenings out in town with the kids in the run up to Christmas. I took it out because it ended up finding its way to being the closest camera in my collection to fitting the bill for a very specific idea I had in my head for a shooting experience I wanted. Funnily enough though, when thinking ahead about what camera I wanted to take on these evenings out, it wasn’t the first camera that came to mind. The first camera that came to mind was one I didn’t already own which triggered a bout of particularly unrealistic GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome). Thankfully, in the end, my current personal financial circumstances put pay to my GAS whims, and actually the outcome has pleased me a lot more than buying a new camera would have. Though when it comes to GAS, there always seems to be a punchline!)

I’m skint at the moment. I don’t want to be seen to be going on about it all the time, but with the new websites and ongoing car issues the lack of disposable income is definitely a factor in my life for the time being. It is just life though – I’ve had to sell some cameras – that’s the way things go sometimes. I’m lucky to have the cameras to sell in the first place, many others aren’t so lucky, so I’m definitely not complaining.

Quite the opposite really. I’ve actually found selling these cameras to be quite cathartic. I plan to come back to what I’ve had to sell and what I’ve been able to keep and why in more detail in a future post I think. The general overview though is that I’m trying to limit the kit to the point of little to no duplication in types of camera, and only lenses that I’ll actually use. I have little discrete sets of kit that I can take out as a whole. So for example I have a little Leica Ic, a 28mm and 40mm that make a nice kit. I have a Contax 139 with the 45mm 2.8 and 85mm 2.8. I did have the 50mm 1.4 and 28mm 2.8 too, but I wouldn’t have used those so they went (the 50mm is still for sale at the time of writing in case you’re interested). The 45mm and 85mm make for a kit that I could easily take out by itself without feeling like I’m missing anything. There are anomalies such as my Nikon AF kit where I have a few more lenses and cameras, but that’s pretty much my main hobby setup at the moment (especially the D700 and F100) and I’m happy with it as it is so it’s not bothering me to have a wider range of kit.

Another example of something I sold which made me feel unusually comforted by parting with it was the Sony RX100vii. Honestly I didn’t think I would ever sell that camera. There was a stage when I carried it around with me almost everywhere I went. I sold it because I bought an iPhone 15 pro max with the 15-120mm equivalent lenses. The Sony just became redundant when I just stopped picking it up. I never thought I’d say this about a smartphone, but honestly the quality of the images (albeit with a bit of AI intervention) is incredible. Of course it’s no where near as good as the Sony in terms of photographic process satisfaction, but actually for the snaps I was using it for, it doesn’t make that much odds just using my phone. I’m still getting photos I like, and the phone is always to hand without having to carry an extra thing.

Shop on my iphone 15 – the out of focus background is all fake, but honestly, for snaps like this, I don’t really care. What I care about is getting the snap and it looking how I want it.

That said, this is where my bit of GAS started. Having sold the Sony I felt I wanted a pocket camera that felt like a “proper” camera. Not something to carry all the time, but something to take out alongside my phone when I wanted a proper photographic experience without the bulk of one of my full sized cameras. The question was, how and what could I buy that would be as small as the Sony but have a proper lens and proper sensor that would allow things like shallow depth of field without the use of AI? The only answer I could think of is the Ricoh GRIIIx. With its APSc size sensor and 40mm equivalent lens, I was initially convinced it was the camera for me. That said, it didn’t take me long to realise that even second hand these cameras aren’t much change from £1000 which is totally out of the question for me at the moment. Not least for the fact that if I had £1000 to spend on a camera right now it would definitely be a Rolleiflex… again, that’s a story for another day!

Thinking about the Ricoh sent me down an interesting path though. The first thing that came to mind was that Pentax/Ricoh (the same company in case you weren’t aware) recently released a black and white only SLR. I remember reading at the time that there were some rumours that they might release a black and white version of one of the GR cameras. This got me thinking more about points of difference from my iPhone. Pocketable, bigger sensor, proper lens and black and white only was now what I wanted. Some more reading and it seems the rumours about a black and white Ricoh have been quashed by one of the guys on the design team there. Whilst reading about this though, I was conveniently linked to an article about a guy who had his colour Ricoh converted to black and white by a company called MG leisure. I found the company on facebook, messaged (just out of interest you understand…) and got a response that it would cost me 499 (euro I guess) for the conversion. Not bad, but I’m now up to best part of £1300-1400 of money I haven’t got for a camera I’d already decided that I wouldn’t buy even if I did have the money.

It also then occurred to me that even if I did buy this camera, have it converted to black and white, spending all that money, it would still be a camera without a viewfinder. This is probably the one thing that always feels lacking from the Ricoh point and shoot cameras to me. Even a fairly small and simple viewfinder would make them a lot more appealing I think. I’m not adverse to using the screen on the back of a camera at all, but it’s definitely nice to have a viewfinder for occasions when shooting in bright sunlight, or even just when the whim takes me. This then became another point of difference I wanted from the iPhone. I wanted a highly pocketable camera with a bigger sensor, proper lens, black and white photos and a viewfinder.

At which point I realised I was at a dead end. I was in a stupid GAS hole that I needed to reverse back out of. Taking the dedicated black and white shooting out of the equation I found myself in a situation where I wanted a pocketable camera with a bigger sensor, proper lens and a viewfinder… and the most logical answer to that question was very probably the Sony RX100vii I had just sold. There was a reason I had bought it in the first place, and that was the fact that it answered so many of these sorts of questions. But I’d sold it because I wasn’t using it enough to justify keeping it. I was using my iPhone more for my daily snaps. What I was actually craving was a little digital camera to take out when I want to have a more of the experience of taking pictures, not just iPhone snaps. And because of my financial situation even thinking down the road of the Ricoh GRIIIx had been pointless. Really what I should have been doing it looking in my camera cabinet at the kit I already own.

I have left in my collection a few very interesting and also quite small digital cameras. The Fuji X100 that I had converted to full spectrum. That ticks most of the boxes. Bigger sensor, lovely viewfinder, proper lens. It’s not quite pocketable though – it’s not far off, but it’s not the sort of size of camera I’m thinking of. And it’s full spectrum converted rather than black and white so already feels like it has a specified purpose within the collection. And to reiterate, it’s just not as pocketable a camera as I’d like.

My full spectrum X100

What else do I have? I have a Sony Nex-5. I keep this camera purely because it makes zero economic sense to sell it – it’s worth next to nothing and mounts a lot of lenses I already otherwise own and use with whatever full size Sony I am currently shooting. It has a flappy screen which I like and is tiny. I’ve shot it in black and white with the Funleader 18mm lens on it and had loads of fun before too. 28mm equivalent is a bit wide for me though – especially at the moment where I’m mostly used to shooting an 85. No viewfinder either. My Sony 35mm 2.8 is a nice fit on it though, so I googled viewfinders for the Nex-5 and found they made one. It’s stupid money. There were also a load of adapters to add a conventional shoe mount to the camera – these are also stupid money. Another dead end, not least because despite being small, it’s not really the tiny size I’m aiming for.

The Panasonic Lumix LX3 was the next camera to consider. Smaller sensor, but a very nice lens and I know its images convert to black and white really nicely. No viewfinder. Though it does have a hot shoe… a bit of reading and I am reminded that it’s hard to set the lens to match an optical finder with this camera. Not impossible (as you can read here), but not very practical. The Panasonic LX5 might be the answer though. Similar camera but it allows a digital viewfinder to be attached. Of course, a bit of eBay searching put pay to that too. £150 for the viewfinder and not far off £100 for the camera just felt like a ridiculous thing to add to my collection when I’m trying to pare down the kit. Plus, I don’t have £250!

What else have I got knocking around in the cabinet? Just a bunch of brightly coloured cameras I bought for the younger kid to play with… … and that’s when I found my yellow Pentax Q7. I forgot I had this camera. I once put it up for sale having never really shot it. I didn’t sell for what I wanted for it, so I took the listing down thinking I might get around to shooting it sometime and then forgot about it. Perhaps it’s time had come…? I fished it out the cabinet, and re-familiarising myself with it I remembered that I have a set of three lenses. The fisheye, the toy pancake lens and the 40mm equivalent f/1.9. This latter lens actually has a great reputation too. That’s to say it’s a “proper” lens. It’s also 40mm-ish equivalent. I have a beautiful Voigtlander 40mm viewfinder and the Pentax has a hotshoe I can mount it too. This is also a very pocketable camera – even with the big VF mounted to the top. Of course, it’s not specifically black and white only. Nor is the sensor very big at all so not much shallow DoF to hand. But, that’s a good few items ticked off the wish list, and more importantly than anything else, this was a camera that I already had in the cabinet.

A bit more tinkering with the camera and I discovered it allows you to shoot RAW and set the camera to black and white. That is to say, the screen shows a black and white preview and photo in playback whilst still saving to RAW. I have Lightroom setup to use it’s built in camera profiles so I knew this would be overwritten at the computer end, but that didn’t bother me too much. A quick select all and a sync of black and white conversion with a bit of added contrast would fix that anyway.

Christmas Light Switch on 23

This rediscovery of the Pentax Q7 came just in time for a little outing into town with the kids to shoot the Christmas light switch-on. This felt like it would be the perfect opportunity to test this little pocketable rig to see if it would fit the bill and scratch that itch for something that fit in my pocket but felt like a proper camera and gave me a satisfying shooting experience in the way an iPhone just can’t. It did too! I was a little worried about the autofocus which isn’t amazing in low light, but in the end it didn’t let me down at all – I got all the shots I wanted. The experience of using the viewfinder sometimes and screen others was exactly what I wanted, and the higher contrast black and white results that popped up on the back screen pleased me in terms of my photographic experience.

Christmas Light Switch on 23
Shot using the optical VF
Christmas Light Switch on 23
Shot using the screen on the back to get over people’s heads

Once I got home, I put them straight onto the computer, didn’t even give Lightroom the chance to show me the colour versions by quickly applying a rough high contrast conversion and I was there. In fact, it was at this point I had another realisation. I don’t need the big modern sensor either. A big modern sensor would just give me cleaner more digital results. The results I took with the Q7 in good light were actually too clean of noise. I made a mental note to fix the ISO at a higher number next time I take the camera out like this. This would give me a more consistent look from one image to the next. The fast f/1.9 lens meant I got a little bit of subject separation when I was taking portraits too.

Christmas Light Switch on 23
The lack of noise/grain here made the shot look to clean and didn’t quite fit the feel I was hoping for

Following on from this outing I took the camera out again to the Worcester Christmas Fayre. I take photos at this Fayre every year, and experience has told me that the best type of shooting experience to enjoy with the kids in tow is one where I can just point and shoot without having to worry about focus. It frustrates me sometimes as I know all the bright colourful lights look lovely blurred into the background of a photo when taken with some weird and wonderful classic lens I am trying to review. But it’s just not practical trying to shoot in such a busy environment when really my job is just to facilitate the kids having some fun. As such, the Pentax Q7 again worked a treat. This time I locked it out at 3200iso to get some consistency in the noise from one frame to the next. Aside from accidentally switching it to a lower ISO for a couple of shots, it worked really nicely!

These shots really sum up the fayre for me. The noise and smoke and bright lights in the dark. The grain just suits them. As, I think does the distortion from the 8.5mm lens when it’s shot in raw (ie without the in-camera correction applied).

Christmas Fayre 23 Christmas Fayre 23 Christmas Fayre 23
Christmas Fayre 23
This is the shot where I accidentally set the camera to a lower ISO. It lacks the noise which I like, but I love the photo anyway!
Christmas Fayre 23

In short, my attack of GAS combined with a lack of cash had resulted in me using a camera I already owned. And do you know what, I was all the more satisfied with the experience. I had the experience and the results I was looking for without spending any money and had got there through using a camera that was no doubt the subject of a previous bit of GAS that I’d never even ended up using. Not only that, but this had happened after I’d sold a bunch of other cameras. Perfect!

…Well nearly perfect. As I said in my intro, when it comes to photography and gear and all the stupid GAS related thought processes that it’s possible to have there was always going to be a punchline. The yellow version of the Pentax Q7 looks pretty cool, there’s no denying that… but is it really me? Am I really comfortable with it, or would I be happier if I had a more discreet and stealthy black camera? I now have an eBay saved search for a black Pentax Q7… unless anyone has one they’d like to swap for a yellow one… …?

Happy Christmas/Holidays Everyone!

Hamish

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Hamish Gill
I started taking photos at the age of 9. Since then I've taken photos for a hobby, sold cameras for a living, and for a little more than decade I've been a professional photographer and, of course, weekly contributor to 35mmc.
View Profile

Comments

Dave Powell on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 28/12/2023

Wow Hamish... What wonderful photos of your kids! When they're older, they'll certainly appreciate having them. One question though, did Pentax ever make a bad camera!? (And I too like the zippy yellow!) Happy New Year my friend! Dave
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 28/12/2023

I hope so! I print a few every year into a book - some of these will make the cut, for sure!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dave Powell replied:

Comment posted: 28/12/2023

What a great idea! And a new name for that Pentax: "Zippy Yellow Cam"!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ibraar Hussain on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 28/12/2023

What a really enjoyable read I can really emphasize with the predicament and the journey you went on here before finding the Pentax you already had ! Lovely photos - the b&w really shine and Bring to life to sights and feel of the fair and a camera I was looking at back in the spring. But they’re going up and up in value! ( And just like to ad that I don’t much like smartphone pictures nor using smartphones to take pictures. I do like the video a lot - but if needs must for proper photos with a smartphone I use Hipstamatic - which I think is superb! )
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Murray Leshner on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 27/12/2023

Wrong post, sorry
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Murray Leshner on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 27/12/2023

When I was a teen, I remember an old guy (that I eventually morphed into) saying 'not a hobby...it's a disease!)
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tony Belding on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 26/12/2023

The long, rambling tale about all the wildly varied cameras you've used and ones you've considered getting is all very familiar territory to me, as I've gone down the same kinds of mental paths. I have a Pentax Q7 Premium Kit, with the 01 (normal prime), 02 (kit zoom), 03 (fisheye), 06 (tele zoom) and 08 (wide zoom) lenses. It's tiny-but-mighty. I've used it heavily in the past, not as much recently, but I'd never get rid of it. I also stumbled onto the Fujifilm X20, a little gem that uses the same batteries as the Q7 (convenient for me) and has a 28-112mm "equivalent" manual-action zoom and a built-in OVF with HUD-like info overlay. Unfortunately, they are asking stupid prices for these on eBay now, because of the whole Fujifilm craze I guess. Here's a different story of gear substitution: Like many, I have lusted after a Hasselblad XPan (or the Fuji-branded counterpart), but balked at shelling out arm leg for an old film camera that might fail at any moment and be impossible to repair. And, like others, I've tried to come up with a suitable alternative. I settled on a Sony A7R Mark II with Voigtländer lenses. Sony cameras have a grid-line option for the LCD and EVF, which, with a little practice, makes it easy to compose shots in 3:2 (native), 1:1 (square) or 3:1 (pano) aspect ratio just by watching the appropriate lines. 3:1 is not exactly XPan 64:25 but it's close enough, especially since the composition can be tweaked in post. RawTherapee has a XPan preset, so it's just a couple of clicks and I'm there. The Color-Skopar 21mm F3.5 and the Nokton 40mm F1.2 are just about ideal for this purpose too, since they have the optical and the build quality, manual focus, manual aperture comparable to XPan lenses, and (unlike most manual lenses) electronic communication with the camera body. Of course it's not film, and for some folks that would just make the whole exercise seem pointless, but I'm very comfortable with post-processing. I can get film-like qualities out of my shots to the extent that I care to.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 26/12/2023

Hi Tony, would you be interested in write a few more words about this setup and approach. Sorry, I don’t often jump on people like this in the comments, but this strikes me as just the sort of thinking that appeals to me at the moment, and I’d very happily share more of it on the website Let me know what you think…

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Robert Baillie replied:

Comment posted: 26/12/2023

I went a slightly different route and created the Q-Pan :). I designed this adapter: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:5767759 which will allow you to thread this anamorphic lens directly onto the Pentax No1 Prime: https://www.ulanzi.com/products/ulanzi-1-55xt-anamorphic-movie-lens-2482 You do have to desqueeze the images in Lightroom but if you set your Q to 16:9 it works out to almost exactly the X-Pan ratio.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 26/12/2023

Broke and happy or wealthy and worried, which would you prefer? Photography isn't and never was about kit until the marketing department got their hands on it. Good photography just requires imagination, as you have aptly demonstrated.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 26/12/2023

Thanks Geoff

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 25/12/2023

great fair photos, lovely kids. 2023 was better for having 35mmc in my life. Thank you for all you do. Cheers to you and yours.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 25/12/2023

Cheers, Art, that very much appreciated!!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ron Beckett on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

I have a Q and it always travels in my camera bag with the K-5 but it is very, very rarely used. In Australia, the sunlight often makes the screen less than ideal. I think I bought it because of GAS (like many if my unused lenses).
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

Sounds like a reason to buy a nice likely optical viewfinder for it ;)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Kary Schumpert on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

This was a lovely story, and a good reminder to enjoy what we already have! Lovely shots!! Happy Holidays to you and yours!!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Eric on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

Great story and images. Very relatable. After a very similar "logic" path that also started with a modern GR I landed on a GXR w/ 28mm and 50mm modules. But now I am searching for a Q of my own. We will see. Thank you for the entertaining post. Happy Christmas.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

And to you mate! And for reference, you got me really close to shelling out for a gxr at one point… had I not been as skint…

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Steve Boykin on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

Yeah, I have one but no way am I am trading it for a yellow one..... :-) Admittedly that yellow is pretty happening though. Hope you and your family have a great Christmas!!! PS- Speaking of GAS......you should get the Shield Cap lens. I loved that one so much I bought an extra in case I lost the original.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

Is that the little toy lens? I have one, but haven’t played with it much yet

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

And yes, merry Christmas to you too!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Huckfield on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

Sometimes it's not about having something bigger and better (more expensive) but just having some fun. Remember what Oscar Wilde said about the difference between price and value. Enjoy what you have! And a Happy Holiday to all on 35mmc.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

Absolutely! Happy hols to you too!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stefan on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

Hello! My always-with-me camera has become a used (like new) Olympus Stylus 1. It only has a small sensor, but it's completely sufficient for my needs. Except for the Panasonic S5 for my old glass, all digital cameras were allowed to move on. But my analogue collection is also under scrutiny. For example, this year, which is now coming to an end, I haven't carried out my Zenza Bronica ETRSi collection once. Not even the existing “X-Pan” back could motivate me. I wish all readers and contributors here a Merry Christmas.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

The clear out is definitely a good plan I think. My brain has felt much less cluttered sorting my kit out!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SteveB on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

I had a Pentax Q and wound up selling it (after taking it on a driving trip thru Colorado, Utah & Arizona). Nice little camera! Have a Merry Christmas, Hamish!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

And you :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

mike tynan on A Bout of GAS, and a Rediscovered Pentax Q7

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

Hamish, you just need bigger pockets. thanks for a great holiday story best , mike
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Hamish Gill replied:

Comment posted: 24/12/2023

I do… don’t we all… Cheers, Mike!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *