Image of a Nikon F3 camera.

Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

By Domen Nan

Let me start by saying that I have never written a camera review before. So go easy on me. If you have any questions, let me know. I am going to keep this quite subjective and personal. When I was reading camera reviews before, I never liked repeated talk about all the technical facts I already knew about. So rather I am going to tell you a story about a relationship between a man and a camera.

The love story started back in 2017, almost a decade ago. Wow, am I old?

A portrait of a man smoking.
A street portrait. One of the images from the first roll I shot with the F3. Maribor, Slovenia. 2017. Kodak Tri-X.

My first analog camera was a Nikon Nikomat. A simple, reliable SLR with a mechanical shutter. I used it quite a lot, but wanted to try other cameras and maybe find the one… After a few other 35mm and 120 format cameras, I got my eye on the Nikon F3. I was introduced to the F3, when I was watching videos from a photographer I really respect, John Free. He was using the Nikon F3 to capture his street photographs. I just had to buy it. And I did. It arrived on October 12th, 2017. It is the last analog camera I bought with the intention of using it. That says a lot.

I was (and still am) charmed by the fact that this was a professional camera, built to be reliable and durable. It feels nice to have a camera that can go all around the world with me. I don’t worry too much about the conditions and if the camera gets beaten around a bit. It’s going to be there and it’s going to work. Nikon F3 was the longest ever produced Nikon camera, introduced in 1980 and discontinued only in 2001, the year I was born. Was this meant to be?

Image of a Nikon F3.
The beauty on Tenerife, Spain, 2025. Shot on iPhone.

The Looks

One thing I love about her…I mean it… is the fact that it’s beautiful. Some say looks don’t matter, but boy, oh boy, they do. Especially when it comes to cameras. I mean, how can this be my lifelong companion, if I don’t feel attracted to it? The Nikon F3 has a gorgeous design that I just can’t get enough of. It has sleek curves that touch your soul, almost all-black design that means business and a splash of red every now and then to convince you it’s not only useful, but also fashionable and sexy. Add to that some wonderful patina it builds over time on your adventures, it becomes a part of you. It was designed by a man named Giorgetto Giugiaro. He designed Ferraris, Alfa Romeos and many other cars. Need I say more?

Portrait of a woman with curly hair.
Karin, making a totally normal face. Lisbon, Portugal, 2026. Kentmere 400.

The Feeling

Joy. That is how I would describe the feeling of using the F3. Every single button or wheel you press, move or touch has a tactile feeling and a nice feedback. Moving the shutter speed dial is a joy, closing the back of the camera is a satisfactory “I am ready to Rock and roll” click. Don’t get me started on the shutter click and advancing the lever. Ah, never mind, do get me started… Shutter sound is confident, not afraid of being noticed, but at the same time not a show-off “look at me” kind of shutter. Certainly not the best choice, if you don’t want people to hear it. I do a lot of street photography, so the sound bothers me a bit at times.

For me, advancing the lever is the most important feeling on a camera. And the F3 does it brilliantly and elegantly. Advancing the film is a super smooth motion, while still maintaining the connection to all the wheels and sprockets that are moving inside.

Holding the camera gives you assurance that the F3 is going to be there, when you need it. It’s not too heavy and not too light. It’s not a brick, like the Nikon F5 or a feather, like many plasticky cameras out there.

The Function

I think the F3 has all functions I need and few of the distracting options. The F3 sits in the transition between the all mechanical F2 and the more electronic F4. It has an electronic shutter, operating from 1/2000s to 8 seconds with a single mechanical speed of 1/60th in the “case of emergency”, if the battery dies. Having a 1/2000s speed is quite useful for opening the aperture on sunny days.

100% viewfinder coverage means what you see is what you get. No surprises after developing and no room for mistakes, either. As I’ve said, the F3 means business.

Some would care a lot for a built-in lightmeter, but I really don’t. I almost never use it, so it is more of an unnecessary feature for me. Same goes for the A – aperture priority mode the camera offers.

Everything seems to make sense and works well. The rewinding and loading the film is fast, you have the option to lock the shutter, it has a self timer, a double exposure option and DOF preview, to name a few features.

The F3 is intuitive. For me, everything makes sense. It’s logical, how the shutter dial moves, where every button is placed and how the camera feels, moves and works. What more can you ask from an analog camera?

Street image of a woman and a dog.
One of my favourite images ever. Shot with the F3, naturally. Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2025. Ilford HP5+.

The Adjustability

Do you own an Apple product? Well, the Nikon F3 is the opposite of that in terms of adjustability. You can change the prism for an HP one, if you use glasses while shooting – it is easier to view the entire frame even while wearing glasses. You can also get a waist level viewfinder, which is super cool. I have to get one of those…

The focusing screen is also interchangeable. You can choose from more than 20 different options to get what you prefer. Of course, you can also attach a motor drive to the camera to make it extra quick or if you don’t like advancing the film yourself. But if the latter is the case for you… the F3 doesn’t deserve you, sorry.

All these options allow you to customise the camera and make it even more “yours”.

Image of a Nikon F3 camera in Lisbon.
The gorgeous in Lisbon, Portugal, 2026. Shot on iPhone. This is the last photo of the camera in this blog, I promise. 🙂

The Irrational

As I mentioned before, Nikon F3 has a lot of history and shooting with it means you can carry that history around. First of all, it feels amazing shooting with a camera made in 1984, many years before I was born. Don’t tell me the latest and greatest digital cameras have the same charm!

It grows on you! I guess this can be true for every camera you use, but the F3 really makes that easy.

In a way, this review is too personal and can mean nothing to you. In the analog world the camera is one of the smallest contributors to the final image next to the film stock and the lens. Yet somehow, it is the most important thing for the heart and the soul. When you look at the camera you feel connected to, it drives you forward, it gets you out to shoot and dare I say: it helps you grow as a photographer too. The F3 might be that for me, it gets me excited to pick it up.

As I am writing this review and remembering all the places, hikes, walks, family vacations, weather conditions and everything in between we have seen together, I can’t help but feel some kind of love towards that sexy piece of copper-silumin-aluminum thing.

B&W image of a tree.
Lisbon, Portugal, 2026. Kentmere 400.

The Red flag

Oh, no… But yes, sadly there is also something that is bothering me with the Nikon F3. It comes down to its basic operation. It is operated by an electronic shutter. That means it needs batteries to work. Here is where I have an issue.

I wouldn’t call myself a purist, but as the years go by, I am starting to realise that for my one main camera I want something mechanical. I don’t mind some added features, such as a self timer or a light meter, even though they are not a necessity. But the core of the camera matters and sadly, the F3’s electronically operated shutter is something I don’t like. The manual 1/60s speed is saving the F3 and is the reason why I am still sticking with it, despite its flaw. Maybe I can move this from a red to an orange flag. I am really trying to save this relationship and not jump over the fence, though I am flirting with the Leica M system. Don’t tell my F3!

Thanks for reading! Would love to hear you thoughts and experiences, as always.

All the best,

Domen

If you liked this post, I would be glad if you joined my personal newsletter, where I share more stories behind images, shorter reflections on photography and more photographs. You can sign up here on my website: Newsletter

Website: domen.nan.si

Instagram: domen_nan_photography

Share this post:

About The Author

By Domen Nan
Domen Nan is a photographer, based in Slovenia. He is a commercial product and food photographer. For personal work, he focuses on street photography, documentary projects and writes a blog. Website: https://domen.nan.si
Read More Articles From Domen Nan

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Ed on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Hi Domen - many thanks for your review. It's an excellent piece and has expressed your passion for this beautiful Nikon SLR. Superb portraits and the image of the dog walkers is very amusing. Great work all round.

Best wishes. Ed
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Ed, thank you for the kind words and I am very glad you like the image. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Miguel Mendez on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Mietras leia tu reseña ,todavia en mi cama ,tenia mi f3 en mi mesa de luz . Es una cámara que enamora . Nunca te desprendas de ella es especial.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Miguel, thanks for your comment. Though I don't speak Spanish and had to get a little help from a translator, it's apparent we share the love for the F3. No te preocupes, no se va a ir a ninguna parte. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bill Brown on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Domen, It's interesting for me to read a camera review from a person born the same year as my daughter. You're not old. I Understand how you feel about the F3 but my affections are for the 1984 Olympic edition Canon F1-n that I purchased in 1984. The Speed finder allows me to go quickly from normal to waist level and it too has interchangeable focusing screens. I wrote a 5 frames tribute to my F1-n in 2024 and it was posted on this site. You and I have similar feelings. Here's my story: https://www.35mmc.com/29/09/2024/5-frames-40-years-1-camera/
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Bill, first of all thanks for your comment. I read your story on the F1-n. It feels so powerful to include 5 images from 5 different decades! Now that's a proper long term relationship with a camera. Amazing. I am super happy to hear stories like that. Hope you two have more wonderful decades together. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Stephen Barnett on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

An interesting well written article and very nice photos. Don't give up on Nikon film cameras made in 2001, the FM3a started life in that year. Auto Exposure, Manual exposure with meter, and full manual exposure (no meter) without batteries, that's right, it doesn't need batteries. Not many cameras can do that, most being limited to an emergency speed like 1/90th or 1/125th if the battery fails, and of course it takes the same vast range of lenses as your F3.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Yes, the whole FM range of cameras is also something I am considering, though I would like paying extra for the features I don't need, such as an Auto exposure. :) Anyway, thanks for commenting, Stephen!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Martin on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Great pics and camera, but if you want to go battery-less you’re going to need the FM3a especially with the 50mm 1.4. Brilliant in every way!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Martin, thanks for reading and leaving a comment. And yes, the whole range of FM cameras is something I am also considering. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Domen,
Quite the love story! The F3 is my most modern film Nikon. I use the meter, so I'm not unhappy with that. It is a prize possession and I feel no need to upgrade. Especially since I have so many lenses. Keep shooting!
Jeffery
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Jeffery, thanks for reading and commenting. Yes, keep enjoying that beautiful camera!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Visited your site. Absolutely >>LOVE<< "Paradox of Choice". How did you get far enough away from the shelves?

I also have a few Nikons. Maybe you should search out an F2? or an FE?
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Gary, thank you very much for taking the time! On the project Paradox of choice I used a Nikkor 19mm PC-e tilt shift lens and made the final image using tens of images stitched together in post-production. Regarding the F2 - yes, a very viable option, but it is quite heavy for everyday carry all the time :) The FE has an electronic shutter and is therefore not interesting for me. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Yes, the F2 is a bit of a beast but a lovely beast just the same.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Pauley on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Hi Domen,

I like your "non-review review" of the F3! You do excellent work with it, judging both by the photos you've posted here and those I've just enjoyed browsing on your website. I briefly had an FA before getting bitten by the Leica bug back in 2019 (an M3 and some Barnack Leicas at present, though my go-to camera will always be a Rolleiflex). I don't think the Leicas are any better than the Nikon was—and in some ways they're objectively inferior to it (close-focus, flash sync/lack of hot shoes, and the absolutely hellacious prices of bodies and lenses). Your vision as a photographer is what impresses me, a real talent that shows up in the street work, portraits, architectural and landscape shots. Keep sharing your work here! It's a pleasure. All best from Brooklyn.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

David, I can't thank you enough for the extremely kind words. It means a lot and I am very glad you like my images. :):) Yes, Leicas and the obsession people have with them is quite interesting - trying to justify the purchase of a Leica is most of the time not a rational thing. But somehow, every now and then, I get a strong wish to own one. Though I am personally quite put off by the "luxury" status they have and of course, the ridiculous prices...

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Dutchison on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Love all the shots but especially the way you squeezed some really nice landscapes into what only needed to be product shots. I have an F for old times sake, and a FE2 for daily - never had an opportunity to shoot an F3
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

David, thanks for commenting. Uh, the F is also missing in my collection of Nikon F cameras. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Nick on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Hi Domen
Great first review, I look forward to more! The answer is F2. It has to be as I can’t afford an F3 as well!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 27/07/2026

Nick, thanks a lot. The F2 is a beast and a beautiful camera, though a bit heavy. And I don't like the huge metered prisms most of them have. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

1980-2001, the same as the Pentax LX which was the better camera in all ways of course ;-). Some very nice and clever images here and on your website. Unless you are committed to an SLR I can recommend the Leica M3, or MP if you prefer 35mmFL.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

Thank you very much for the comment, Geoff! A friend of mine recently mentioned that he feels the same way about his Pentax LX as I do with my F3, but I have never tried that camera. :) In the Leica world, I slightly prefer the M2 and M4 over the M3 in terms of looks. The MP is also beautiful, of course, but is super expensive, as is the M-A. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Walter Reumkens on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

You can certainly have a fling with the Leica M system, but enter into a long-term relationship? No!
Anyone who’s bought a Leica at a completely exorbitant price is, of course, full of praise for it. Rangefinders are a small niche market. And there are equivalent and cheaper alternatives out there. They probably lack the image that drives quite a few ‘photographers’ to buy a Leica.
I’ve been using an F3 HP since the early 1990s; it still works perfectly, and I don’t see any battery issues. For anyone who finds that a problem, I can only recommend the Nikon FM3A. Thanks for the article – lovely photos.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

I would not be buying a Leica, because it's better than my Nikon, but I would be buying it for its appealing looks, (more) silent shutter, the feel of using it and a bit for the history of Leica. I really don't like the "luxury" status they get with this ridiculous prices and the posh feeling surrounding them...it's one of the main reasons I haven't bought one yet... And yes, the whole FM range is interesting to me and I am considering all of those cameras also. :) Thanks, Walter.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Teej on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

John Free. G.O.A.T.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

YES, Teej! Finally someone gets it hehe :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Teej on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

ALSO IMO FM3a > M-cameras
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

Maybe I should buy both and see for myself? :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tim Bradshaw on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

An obvious choice, if you like the F3 but want a mechanical camera, might be an F2. The metered heads are more functional than pretty, and you want to make sure they work, but as you say you can live without a meter a plain prism one would be an option. I think the plain prism ones are very pretty cameras.

I find mine (DP1 meter, 50mm lens) a very lovely thing to use: the camera just goes away when you're working with it.

And very tough: I have mended mine with a hammer after I dropped it (quite a small hammer, OK).
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

The F2 is a beast. I want to add it to my collection of Nikon F's. And yes, it's super tough. I would argue that it seems even tougher than the F3. Tim, thanks for reading and commenting! :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

Domen. I love my F3. That camera has earned and deserves all the accolades it gets. I bought mine in the early 80's and it still works like a charm. I was a news photog back then and had to have a Nikon so my gear matched the rest of the staff. That allowed me to borrow lenses from others. I more often than not used my FM2 since it was smaller and a bit more discrete. I just like a smaller camera. But your comment about the motor drive and saying the "F3 doesn’t deserve you" is not right if you did what I did. That motor drive, still attached and working on mine, was a marvel. The grip, sturdiness and balance that it gave the camera was great. And there is nothing like the F3 shutter sound when that motor drive is pushing it forward. It's magic to my ears.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

Art, I get what you mean. Honestly, I have never tried adding a motor drive to any of my manual wind cameras, so I can't relate to the sound of the winder, but what I meant to say with "doesn't deserve you" was just that advancing the manual lever is a feeling you just have to admire. :) Doesn't mean you can't like the motor drive as well. :) Thanks for reading! :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AlistairH on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

I clearly remember that "Red Flag" being discussed ad nausiem over forty years ago, when the F3 was released. I so remember all the voices which said that the F3 will be a failure in comparison to the F2, and that professionals will never use it, because it needs a battery to fire its shutter. We all know which side of that argument won out in the long run!

Nowadays, no-one would ever dream of going on a shoot without lots of extra batteries. Back in the '80s, we still had to learn this! I remember ending up on a Scottish island with a Canon AE-1 (a truly vile machine, IMO) to find that a design flaw in the camera had flattened its brand-new (normally months-long enduring) battery en-route. I had no spare and none was available on the island, which cost me dear.

That was then, and this is now. We now all know how to deal with batteries: just carry lots of spares, even if you should not think you will need to! Once in that mindset, the F3 is surely as good as it gets.

Having said all that, for me personally, and because a film camera is now just my toy and not my professional tool (which is a Z7), in my hands the F2AS would be my favourite - everything about it is so close to perfection. The F2 was the first professional camera I ever held up to my eye, and I remember doing it like it was yesterday, despite it being actually half-a-century ago. But, if I had to use a film camera professionally, the F3 (with a couple of spare batteries in my bag) would just about nail it!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 28/07/2026

What you are describing is exactly what I am trying to convince myself to do. Just take extra batteries and you have a dream camera. But the thing is; I don't want to have to take extra batteries. I would prefer a complete manual experience. :) But there are always compromises... decisions, sweet decisions :) Thank you very much for reading and for sharing your thoughts. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Okiman on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 29/07/2026

Well, I have quite similar sentiment towards fully mechanical cameras, hence my day-to-day Nikon is an early FM. To me it is the mechanical equivalent of Leica M2, albeit with a light meter, that I don't use. And the early ones have shutter release lock on the shutter ring and don't need to have the advance lever half-pulled. And the size is just like Leica M, not bigger like the F2. But, yeah, nowadays we shoot film cameras for the joy of it, and if you fancy a fully mechanical camera, be it SLR or rangefinder (or even Leica), it doesn't matter how "good", battery depended, "professional" or anything else they are (were?). It is just the fact that you want to use them and if they bring you joy when you do so.
What I'm saying here is, go for a Leica M, for you, preferably M2, since you don't need a light meter, mostly shoot 35mm and I believe you'd appreciate it more than the plastic-tipped M4s.
Oh, let's not forget, you have some wonderful photos in your articles and on you website. Respect! And keep up the good job.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 29/07/2026

Okiman, thanks for the kind words! :) I agree that the most important thing is how a camera makes you feel and if it's enjoyable. Yes, I was also thinking a Leica M2, but I would really like a black Leica M (if I even really want a Leica), hence why I was taking a look at the M4-2. Maybe an M2 and then a repaint? But that costs a lot of money. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael on Nikon F3 review – A love story with a red flag

Comment posted: 29/07/2026

Enjoyed the photos and commentary. If you don't use the in camera meter an F2 or FM2 is a better choice than the FM3A.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Domen Nan replied:

Comment posted: 29/07/2026

Thanks for reading and sharing your thoughts, Michael. I am strongly considering the whole line of Nikon FM's. Why would you say the FM2 is a better choice than the FM3A? Just curious for your opinion. :)

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *