Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest

By Neal Wellons

I’m a long term reader of 35mmc and recently read an interesting article, The Miniature Camera Monthly by Art Meripol, 27 February 2026. Art gave readers a look at the August, 1939 issue of this early photography magazine. As I read through the articles, I came to this page of cameras.

As a camera collector, I perused the cameras in the ad carefully to see what I might like.  I immediately spotted the Skyview D 3 1/4 X 4 ¼ camera with Tessar lens which was obviously an aerial camera from the period.  From the viewfinder proportion, I thought this might be smaller than many of the classic aerial cameras I have seen.  I did an online search and found almost no information, except this from Historic Camera.com, a site maintained by the Historic Camera Collector’s Club (used with permission.)

Not expecting any luck in finding one, I was surprised to see there was a camera listed on an auction site as Skyview aerial camera Carl Zeiss 150mm F4.5 lens + bag mag + plate holder + case. The price was not cheap, but not horrible and the description showed it would be one I could easily carry at 5 pounds, especially with the large handle on the side. It also focused closer than I expected for an aerial camera so that it would be easily usable on the ground.

 

I just had to buy it.

In addition to wanting it from a camera collector’s viewpoint, I also have a bit of history with aerial photography.  After college, I took a three month job while waiting to enter the Air Force.  The job involved using blueprint sized aerial photographs of real estate property lines for a tax evaluation program.  In the Air Force, I was an aerial photo interpreter and viewed many hundreds of aerial photographs.  Years later, I bought an airplane and often shot  photos out the window of my Cessna 150. I also flew in a county helicopter and shot pictures of all our facilities for enlargements and mounting in the board room, all with my Olympus OM-1.  It appears that aerial photography is in my blood.  But now there is a twist and that is terrestrial photography with an aerial camera.

The actual camera differed slightly from the overview from the Historic Camera Collector’s Club in that it focused to 5 feet and there is no infinity focus lock. All sounded good there.  The kit came with two film holders.  One was a Graflex “Bag Mag” and the other was a Graflex Film Pack Adaptor.  Neither looked like anything I would want to use and there was no spring back or Graflok back on the camera.  My choices were to buy some standard sheet film holders plus a spring or Graflok back or instead, a Graflex Graphic 23 roll film holder (6X9 format on 120 film.)  The normal film size for this camera is 3 1/4 X 4 1/4, a not so common size that makes availability of all the accessories that I considered limited and more expensive.  I chose the roll film holder that I found on the same auction site.  When it arrived, I had to fabricate a wider aluminum strip to hold the roll film adapter against the camera and added a felt seal along a space that was apparent.  It was quick work with a hacksaw and drill.

Original back holder.
My modified back holder with Graflex 23 roll film adaptor.
Note cross hairs in viewfinder, Zeiss Tessar 150mm f/4.5 lens and shutter button extension.
The focus wheel is clear in this shot.  So is the cold shoe that could be useful for a rangefinder when focusing the shallow depth-of-field large format lens.

I cleaned the shutter, attached the roll film back, and shot a test roll of 120 format film to check for light leaks and focus.  All went well.

How does it shoot? It is a bit heavy at 6 pounds, 5 ounces with the back and requires a number of steps. First you release the film winder, then wind the film, set shutter speed, f/stop and focus.  Before shooting you also have to cock the shutter.  But that really isn’t any different with shooting another Graflex 23 roll film back on my 2 ½ X 3 ½ Speed Graphic. And did I say it was fun? Yes it is.

Here are some shots, appropriately from a local airport.

 

Finally, while searching the auction site, I found this postcard noting the photograph was courtesy of  Skyview Camera Company.  I had to add it to my kit.

Now I need to take this camera up in an airplane, preferable a biplane.  Not sure when or if but I can dream.

Addendum

Shortly after I wrote this article, I purchased three Skyview Camera advertisements, clipped from old camera magazines.  The first and third ads shows the smaller Skyview Model K camera while the second one shows the model I have, the Model D

Skyview Aerial Camera Model K Advertisement
Skyview Aerial Camera in Open Cockpit Advertisement
Skyview Aerial Camera Model D advertisement

 

But wait, there’s more.  While digging through the internet, I found the following picture of Amelia Earhart with a Skyview Model K.  She is holding it with the lens up and it does not seem to have a film back attached.

I am publishing this image through the courtesy of the Ohio Camera Collectors Society and am using it with their permission and the Estate of Derwin Worster.

 

Amelia Earhart With Skyview Aerial Camera

 

 

Share this post:

About The Author

By Neal Wellons
I am a photography addict who also collects cameras. I started shooting adjustable cameras in 1960 and now have about 250 cameras in my collection and have shot most of them. I shot and developed over 200 rolls of film in both 2024 and 2025. My internet presence is on Flickr. You can find me at Neal Wellons or neal3k.
Read More Articles From Neal Wellons

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Gary Smith on Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest

Comment posted: 07/05/2026

I was going to ask about its construction but McKeown's shows two Skyview cameras: a Model D and a Model K. Yours appears to be a Model D. Both have cast aluminum bodies. McKeown's shows the Model D to be equipped with a Goerz Dogmar f4.5 lens in an Ilex Acme shutter (which differs from your configuration) while the Model K is listed with a Wollensak Aerialstigmatf4.5/5 lens. No production numbers were given in McKeown's. The datasheet at the Historic Camera Collector’s Club seems to either agree with or was the source for the info in McKeown's.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Neal Wellons replied:

Comment posted: 07/05/2026

Thanks for the comment. I don't have the McKeown's reference and yes, mine is a model D. I've only found one other photograph of the Skyview camera online. It was in a display at the Ohio Camera Collector's Society. I just checked, found and purchased three Skyview Advertisements from old camera magazines. I'm so glad you replied and got me looking again.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffrey J Luhn on Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest

Comment posted: 08/05/2026

Neal,
Very interesting post, and good photos! I don't think any other point-and-shoot camera would want to meet your Skyview in a dark alley!!!
Back in the mid 1970's there was a building boom in the San Francisco Bay Area and I was hired to shoot loads of aerial shots for city planners and developers. My friend had a Luscombe plane, circa 1948. It was a good spotting plane and the passenger door was easy to remove before take off. Very slow air speed! We flew out of a muni airstrip in Hayward, Ca. I used a Hasselblad with a bulk film back. The job paid well. One day, while I was looking to buy a large format aerial camera for higher resolution shots, I met the guys at Pacific Aerial Surveys at the Oakland airport. Those guys had a downward mounted camera with 9" motorized roll film. It imprinted the location on the negative!!!! How? I don't know. They were doing shots for the California Division of Highways and were constantly updating their files. I just bought current shots from them and marked them up. MAN THEIR STUFF WAS SHARP!!!! If you're ever at the civil aviation area at Oakland airport, you will see lots of their huge prints. HUGE! You can see people in their backyards cutting grass. HUGE PRINTS.
I imagine shooting on the street with your camera would get some looks!!! Keep posting your good stuff!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Neal Wellons replied:

Comment posted: 08/05/2026

Thanks for the great story Jeffrey, Yes, the Skyview is a hunk of metal. It could take on any other camera, at least in a dark alley. I understand how cool the shots you saw from the California highway department. As a photo interpreter in the Air Force, I got to see a lot of good stuff, even U2 coverage. Even in those days, the resolution was really good. And now, it goes past amazing. You are also right about getting looks. On my outing at an air show recently, it was a real conversation starter.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn replied:

Comment posted: 08/05/2026

I hope you'll post more shots from that camera. It's quite a machine!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Neal Wellons replied:

Comment posted: 08/05/2026

Thanks so much. Other than articles here on 35mmc, I only post on Flickr where I also maintain camera albums, including the Skyview. Here is a link to the album. https://www.flickr.com/photos/97423979@N00/albums/72177720332522861/

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Art Meripol on Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest

Comment posted: 08/05/2026

Neal, I’m so excited to see that my post here led to your purchase and restoration of this gem of a camera. Those shots are just lovely. I’ve never played with an aerial camera but i do have a few prints from WWII from some bombing runs by my Dad and his crew in a B-24. I’ve done a fair amount of aerial shooting from Cessnas and Helicopters but not with a true aerial camera. Truly enjoyed your post.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Neal Wellons replied:

Comment posted: 08/05/2026

And thanks again to you Art. This is the first time I've shot an actual aerial camera too. I used my Olympus OM-1 for my shots from my Cessna and a helicopter back in the 1980s and 1990s. I am really enjoying the Skyview and am so glad I bought it.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Omar Tibi on Skyview Aerial Camera – 35mmc started the quest

Comment posted: 10/05/2026

Whew, Neal, what a camera! As an aviation buff, seeing this camera brought back to life is beautiful, and you made some excellent photos. The quality of the lens shows through even almost a century later, it is sharp but without too much bite, all of your shots are very pleasant to look at. How difficult was it to focus given the long FL/shallow DOF?

I'm also very curious as to your experience interpreting aerial photographs. I can only imagine how overwhelming trailing through miles of negatives can be! Did you use color at all? I know panchro has the best detail resolution at altitude, but I'm curious what purpose something like Aerocolor would've had.

Happy shooting!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Neal Wellons replied:

Comment posted: 10/05/2026

Thanks for your questions, Omar. As far as focus goes, at distances in sunlight stopped down to f/16 and f/22 with ISO 100 film, guessing worked for me. When subjects were closer, I carried a Leica II with me with a 50mm lens and could focus with it first and even shoot comparison shots. Both the Leica and Skyview lenses were in normal views. As a photo interpreter, 99% of our work was with black and white film but we would also get what we called "pretty pictures" which were mainly color shots for PR purposes including city shots to be presented to officials of that city. It is possible it was Aerocolor but I don't know. By the way, most of my 35mm color film is Santacolor 100 (Aerocolor) that I bought in bulk rolls.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *