Beauty Lightomatic II

5 frames with Beauty Lightomatic II

By Cem Eren

I had been on the hunt of an analogue range finder camera for a while. Since I don’t plan to switch to another system camera, a fixed lens, affordable one would suit my needs. I had been checking the local listings with the hope that I would find a camera supporting full manual settings with a working light meter, ideally requiring no battery to operate. I don’t need a light meter measuring with 21st century precision standards. I need one either to support or confuse me while I am guessing. That’s my joy, who cares. Finally, I have got one Beauty from a trusted private seller whom I dealt with before, a Beauty, don’t get me wrong, it is the brand, an obscured Japanese brand dissolved in early 60s. According to the online information I can find, mine is the second generation of the series.

Before I received the package, I have searched for and found the user manual in Butkus. When I saw some photos in the document, a woman handling the camera, it seemed quite big. I was curious a bit, and thought the woman was small. When I received the camera, then I understand the dimensions. The woman was certainly not small. This camera has almost the same form factor and similar size with my Nikon FE. It is as heavy as FE too. It feels solid 60s production, produced to last. All the settings are done via the rings installed around the lens. It has a self-timer and surprisingly it is working. When I did a few focus practices, the distance was correct compared to my DF’s readings.

It has a selenium light-meter, and a needle view on the top plate and in the view finder. The objective is to align it to the centre as much as possible. It has a sort of exposure index feature, if it is right to say so, coupling the speed and the aperture setting and allowing to move them together with the ISO setting ring. The settings may be overridden at any time by using their individual rings. So, once you measure the light, set the aperture and shutter, you can change the exposure value without changing that measurement easily, without counting the steps down and steps up with aperture and shutter corelation.

The lens is Biokor S f1.9 45mm. I know it is a good lens. I read a few posts here and there, hearing about the guys converting the lens to use with the digital cameras. I don’t have any plans to dismantle it as it is too beautiful. Here are the photographs taken with the Beauty on Ilford hp5 400.

Basketball playground right before accessing the forest path Sunlight hazes behind the trees Horseshape tree behind the fence An elderly tree on the path A tiny house by the creek

Thank you for reading. You may reach me on Instagram.

Share this post:

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £2.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

About The Author

By Cem Eren
I am a photography enthusiast since early 1980s. I had setup my dark room in early 2000s, a bit late but the circumstances. I no longer develop my rolls, but still print my own, using a Meopta enlarger and Ilford solutions. I do take digital photos. I am a software architect.
View Profile

Comments

Russ Rosener on 5 frames with Beauty Lightomatic II

Comment posted: 29/11/2024

Beautiful camera I was not aware of. I have a few Japanese rangefinders from the late 50s and early 60s. A Canon VT, Canon P, and the original Canon 7. All used M39 lenses which I had a few of. You are correct that all of those Photo Machines are fantastically built to last at least two lifetimes. The Beauty camera you own seems to be the same quality. I do wonder if the selenium meter registers at all. Exposure readings could indeed be very random. Of course even when new the meter was merely a guide rather than an instrument.

Your photos have those fantastic smooth gradations and open shadows which lenses from that era are renowned for. Lens makers try to emulate it today. However it doesn't seem to possible as that rendering is a relic of the raw materials and manufacturing craftmanship of a bygone era.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cem Eren replied:

Comment posted: 29/11/2024

Thanks Russ. You are right, While photographing, I did not feel like I could set the shutter speed solely relying on it if I did not have a reference point.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Steviemac on 5 frames with Beauty Lightomatic II

Comment posted: 29/11/2024

I love these somewhat obscure Japanese cameras from the 1960's. The name Lightomatic is so redolent of the era in which it was made. I had a Beauty Lightomatic III which, although it's meter was inoperative, still made excellent images. At the time, I had the Lightomatic, a Konica S2 and a Canon Canonet QL17. All three are very similar in size, specification and results. They even look much alike. They were all bought in the noughties when such cameras were available for pocket change. If only I'd known - sigh. The Konica decided to self destruct, and with the Beauty and Canon being almost identical, I sold the Beauty and kept the Canon due to it's fabulous lens and the wonderful QL (quick loading) system. No regrets, but the Beauty was just as capable as it's two more illustrious companions.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cem Eren replied:

Comment posted: 29/11/2024

Thanks Stevie. I could not agree more. Probably, I would do the same if I were in your shoes.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on 5 frames with Beauty Lightomatic II

Comment posted: 30/11/2024

Cem,
I enjoyed your article. I've never seen or heard of the Beauty camera, but it looks similar to other rangefinders I've owned. Classic function. A lot of those were in dump bins of second hand stores when I was in high school in the late 1960s. I had one that produced good images, but I bought into Nikon. I have no idea what brand it was, or where it went, but it sure looked like yours.

I liked your photos.

Jeffery
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cem Eren replied:

Comment posted: 30/11/2024

Thanks Jeffery. I would love to own a Nikon S2 in the days.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Thomas Wolstenholme on 5 frames with Beauty Lightomatic II

Comment posted: 30/11/2024

Neat camera. It reminds me in many ways of the last of the Kodak Retina series of 35mm cameras.
I really like the photograph of the country lane. Very evocative of all sorts of imaginings.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cem Eren replied:

Comment posted: 30/11/2024

Thanks Thomas.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bill Brown on 5 frames with Beauty Lightomatic II

Comment posted: 30/11/2024

Nice. Images 3 and 4 look like some form of woodland creatures. Maybe a Llama in #3? The road in image 2 could be almost anywhere. So many cameras I have no knowledge of.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cem Eren replied:

Comment posted: 30/11/2024

Thanks Bill.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Man Jacovus on 5 frames with Beauty Lightomatic II

Comment posted: 08/12/2024

What's the other camera in the pic? Why is it even shown if you don't mention it? V frustrating!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Cem Eren replied:

Comment posted: 08/12/2024

It is a Nikon FE mentioned in the 2nd paragraph.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *