On Insincerity

By Andrea Monti

This is a rant.

It was caused by the umpteenth self-promotional, vertically shot from above video made toting a smartphone, in which, after the hideous opening — ‘hey guys’ — the main, and only, character promotes a personal achievement while pretending merely to ‘share a — God forbid — thought’.

I usually try to be factual in my writing, stating my case in a clear and concise manner, always focusing on the merits of an issue and never blaming a person or a category.

But.

My firm belief is that, when we join a community — musicians, sportsmen, writers and, of course, photographers — we must, must, not should, respect its ethos. This means, in particular, refraining from trivialising what lies at the core of that community: its values, its language, and also its different ways of doing things. This is why I — plainly and simply — dislike, from the depths of my heart, the flood of poorly taken photos and videos that have invaded the various content-sharing platforms available on the internet.

I am not talking about composition, exposure, sharpness, ‘the moment’ and so on — the rant is not about quality or lack of skill — because what unsettles me is the lack of sincerity.

Unless a photo is meant to be sold to a client, in which case it must be good, there are no good or bad photos out there. Each photo is a step in a personal journey, and all that matters is that what we shoot today is better than what we did yesterday and worse than what we will do tomorrow. But each photo, irrespective of its ‘value’, is an act of sincerity, and the act of sharing it means, in fact, sharing a part of oneself.

I cannot provide exact figures or statistically sound data, but it is my understanding that a large majority of the photo and video content — I cannot call them photographs and videos — made available online is simply sloppy: not as a deliberate way of breaking the rules and experimenting with something different, but merely sloppy and self-centred, because it reflects the insincere attitude of those who shot it.

Are these people part of the photographic community at large? One may rightly say that what they do is not ‘proper photography’ and that ‘real photographers’ are a different breed.

That attitude, however, reminds me of the contempt that the Greeks had for foreigners, whom they called ‘barbarians’ because they sounded as if they were stuttering when they spoke. ‘Barbarians’ may stutter but, as the late Roman Empire learned the hard way, they eventually won.

So, what should we do — if, in the first place, we are supposed to do anything?

I am afraid that there is nothing we can do, least of all simply stop giving a damn about these by-products of attention economy. We certainly cannot stop people from producing them, but at least we can try not to supporting them through views and click.

Share this post:

About The Author

By Andrea Monti
My name is Andrea Monti. I’m an Italian free-lance journalist, photographer and – in my spare time – an hi-tech lawyer. The works I am more proud of are covering live jazz, pop and rock concerts for an Italian online music magazine and Opera and prose for a 200 years-old theatre. I also do sport photography mainly in athletics and fighting disciplines. You may find out more about me on https://andrea.monti.photography
Read More Articles From Andrea Monti

Find more similar content on 35mmc

Use the tags below to search for more posts on related topics:

Donate to the upkeep, or contribute to 35mmc for an ad-free experience.

There are two ways to contribute to 35mmc and experience it without the adverts:

Paid Subscription – £3.99 per month and you’ll never see an advert again! (Free 3-day trial).

Subscribe here.

Content contributor – become a part of the world’s biggest film and alternative photography community blog. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.

Sign up here.

Make a donation – If you would simply like to support Hamish Gill and 35mmc financially, you can also do so via ko-fi

Donate to 35mmc here.

Comments

Andrew on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

My wife and I recently had the privilege of a boat journey round the caldera/bay of Santorini and a visit and swim at the small volcanic cone in the centre. It was absolutely stunning.
But what I couldn’t get my head around was a younger millennial who spent the entire time posing and filming herself, presumably to go on YouTube or similar, and presumably to promote herself or some “offer”.
I admit to being tempted to tear her phone off her, chuck it over the side, and tell her to just live in the moment…..
All I can offer is that at the end of the day, it is those who do these vacuous things who ultimately will pay the price when they look back and see what they missed out on……
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Mackay replied:

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

it's the height of irony that by noticing her being on her phone you yourself were not in the moment either. We're all guilty of it but it's definitely something to think about why we can feel that way. The urge to take the phone and throw it doesn't fix the situation and will not help that person feel in the moment, well at least not the one you intended anyway!

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Alexandre Kreisman on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

Dear Andrea,
I believe this is a clash of generation and education. The newcomers are so used to have it all instantly that no they are not photographers. They shoot , make video on phone where they have access to a bunch of filters/modifiers/etc. and use that to gain attention, sometimes money. It's part of their life, just as having a camera on me is part of my life. And i guess for you too.
You are right to rant about it, it's something that bothers me a lot, but what can we do, apart from ignoring them. Earlier Iphone photographs did wonderful images, but nowadays, itt's just a click and a lot of filters, sometimes IA.
They are a community different than ours and of their own.
just my 2 cents
Cheers
Alex
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Jeffery Luhn on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

Andrea,
We live in a world where people don't talk face-to-face as they used to. When I walk around the college campus where I teach, I see groups of young people sitting near each other, but looking at their phones. I have critical thoughts about them, but later in the day when I eat lunch, I have a sandwich in one hand and my phone in the other. I'm doom scrolling. Let's face it: At least posting photos is a bit interactive. They are saying, "Look at me!"
When I have a free moment don't even do that.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gary Smith on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

AM> So, what should we do...
AM> I am afraid that there is nothing we can do,
AM> at least we can try not to supporting them through views and click

Asked and answered!
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David Mackay on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

I guess this issue I have with this article is twofold Andrea. I simply do not believe that there is a photographic 'ethos' or photographic community.

Whether someone accidentally takes a photo of themselves when navigating a smartphone or sets up a large format camera akin to Ansel Adams what unifies them is that they both took a photo. That is no community, no more than I belong to a community because I own an iPhone. We can find community though as we have here on 35mmc.

As you correctly stated there is no right or wrong way to take a photograph and therefore I believe there is no ethos. A camera is a tool and people use it for a variety of reasons, including as a way to communicate. You yourself take photos in part to write about your experience on this website, at its core is that really all that different from someone sharing a video or photo on a larger social media site for engagement? The form and motivation are different of course but at its core I don't think there is much difference beyond the intended audience.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

JA on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

Christ what a load of pseudo intellectual nonsense.

Why would i care what other people choose to do in their own time. Unless it negatively impacts other where is the harm?

Or we could go online and write an overlong piece to tell everybody how superior we are
....
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

RC replied:

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

Exactly.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

marco on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 24/07/2026

This actually brings to mind the poem
Waiting for the Barbarians, C. P. CAVAFY

Why isn’t anything going on in the senate?
Why are the senators sitting there without legislating?

Because the barbarians are coming today.
What’s the point of senators making laws now?
Once the barbarians are here, they’ll do the legislating.



Why this sudden bewilderment, this confusion?
(How serious people’s faces have become.)
Why are the streets and squares emptying so rapidly,
everyone going home lost in thought?

Because night has fallen and the barbarians haven't come.
And some of our men just in from the border say
there are no barbarians any longer.

Now what’s going to happen to us without barbarians?
Those people were a kind of solution.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrew on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

This is a real problem, and I don't mean "I don't like this therefore if is my problem." I mean obsession with social media and the inevitable trend of tuning to sales men we coined "influencers" to address problems is a terrible idea that can never work. This mentality of share all see all and purchase a problem then purchase a product to solve self imposed problem is just distracting people and sapping them of time and money that was already scarce. Social media and the insincere attitude so many users have and promote has damaged peoples perception of reality. I don't know what to do but I avoid IG and Facebook a lot of the time and I have not tried a new social media platform in a long time as I know more of this will never solve the problems.
Documentarian Adam Curtis said something to the effect of: the most radical thing one can do is walk from London to Beirut and not blog about it. I think he is on to something.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Russ Rosener on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

Sincerity in all walks of life is in short supply. 30 years ago it was easy to take a photograph. Yet it was usually done because someone wanted and needed to remember that moment. Sure there were plenty of banal snapshots, as you noted in not criticizing bad composition, exposure, etc. But at least the INTENT was sincere. Now social has turned photographs into something to consumed and forgotten, like popcorn in a movie theater. This is a real loss.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Geoff Chaplin on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

"Dumbing down" has manifested itself in many ways - the smartphone and instant, AI calculated, image or video taking is just one of many manifestations. There are worse - look at the USA or Germany in the 1930s. Hopefully the girl in your story has a more productive interests too and this may be her relaxation. But I agree with your conclusion, and more, don't fall for advertising in any of its forms.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leon Winnert on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

Attention economy. Never heard that expression before. But Great! Sums up the situation perfectly. Posting photos on social media is mainly about getting 'likes'. The likes have a 2 fold purpose. Positive strokes for the recipient’s fragile ego. And a largely false belief that the more likes a photo receives it is increasing testament to its quality and artistic merit. As the first rule of propaganda says tell a lie often enough and people will believe it. So it is with the garbage posted on social media.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dan Delaney on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

I don't have an i-phone.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bill Brown replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

Nor I.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Dan replied:

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

Thank you Bill. I thought I was alone.

Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Bill Brown on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

I've been camera scanning a photographers documentary transparency archive from the 1980's and early 1990's. He photographed all over the world but the specific work I've been scanning is dedicated to the Texas Cowboy Reunion in Stamford, Texas in the early 90's. At the same time he was photographing this annual event I was photographing a small West Texas annual event in Brownfield, Texas. Both events included a parade to kick off the festivities. As I've been scanning I've noticed similarities between the two unrelated events. I mentioned this and we both honed in on the one main similarity. Everyone was smiling, talking and interacting with each other and the activities. The small kids were waving at the parade participants or picking up the candy that was being tossed to them. NO CELLPHONES. It's a time lost forever. I'm so glad we both caught this time and our images have become historical documents without that being our intention. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle so the sooner you accept this reality the quicker you can move forward. Moving forward doesn't have to mean giving in though.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Derek Zhao on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 25/07/2026

I'm curious what exactly counts as sincere or insincere content to you. I do tend to roll my eyes when I see folks get caught up in trends (the latest on Instagram are the "yes, but" photo posts and the "let's normalize one photo and not a carousel" nonsense).
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Christopher Welch on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 26/07/2026

Hello Andrea, thanks for your post. In 2022 I made the decision to exit social media. It is not for me. And I absolutely don't miss it. I do watch YouTube on occasion, but even that has become very homogenized, with every content maker creating essentially the same material, with the same soundtrack, the same slow motion sequences, etc. And I know why they do it, it gets likes. And likes pay you money. My point being there is an entire culture of content makers and it's not necessarily about making meaningful content, it's about getting paid. They can have it. I stopped caring years ago.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Keith A Yeo on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 30/07/2026

Thank you Andrea, thought provoking 'rant' and even more so the range of comments below :)

I'd like to believe that I believe in 'sincere' phototaking. It is an admirable notion that each photo is a piece of self, a journey; I admire you for believing that. Perhaps you (or we?) are in the minority. Amongst the photo-taking public, how many believe in that 'ethos' of photograph you (or we?) cherish?

As you says 'there are no good or bad photos out there', perhaps there is no right or wrong ethos about photography.
But I know I'd like to ascribe to your ethos and live up to it.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

David on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 30/07/2026

I wondered whether to hold my peace or join in this lively conversation. I feel divided. It seems to me that at this point we all know the ills of social media and how they have affected individuals and groups to such an extent that it has become a recurring topic of conversation. I also wonder if "rants" might be integral to this endemic approach to the digital image and part of its use value. There might be a connexion with cancel culture "alla lontana" a distant one, but perhaps part of the same behavioural pattern.
How to respond when faced with people, often young people, smiling at their smartphone against a background which could be a tourist site or one if several alternative options we can all imagine after several years of image flows?

I can only speak for myself. By making or developing a different photographic practice which speaks to me, inspires me to try that little bit harder and part of that is a choice to ignore this rapidly aging trend.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Andrew Moore on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 02/08/2026

I get the sentiment here, and my only take on the 'attention economy' phenomenon is that of the changing of generations. Every generation is supposed to rebel against the one before, and creative arts are an accessible method of this sacred rebellion. Whether it's one's taste in music, choice of sports team or why someone chooses to make an image; I believe people simply seek some form of expression that might make them stand-out. Even if only for 'fifteen minutes of fame'.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Michael Murray on On Insincerity

Comment posted: 03/08/2026

You sure have garnered a lot of conversation with this post. I could be wrong, but I think what you might be getting at is far beyond photography, or art, or culture. WHY do we do what we do? Is an image taken for a personal connection, project, or close family member more sincere and authentic than on taken to sell something? In my mind: yes. The "sell" is what makes me worried. It's harder to earn a normal living than it was 50 or 60 years ago, so I don't begrudge someone seeking view and $$$. But at a certain point, it really does feel like, to a greater and greater degree, we are selling our selves.
Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *